In a perfect world, countries treat each other with respect, equality and reciprocity, but this is not a perfect world. International politics is all about give and take and weighing the pros and cons, which is why the public should refrain from jumping to conclusions over each perceived slight.
On Monday, the Thailand Trade and Economic Office in Taipei announced that in light of the large demand for Thai visas, it had decided to outsource some of the work to a private visa agency, which is to charge a service fee of NT$470 on top of the NT$1,200 visa fee. It said that the measure would offer an alternative to visa applicants, who currently have to line up for hours at the office to submit their applications between 9am and 11am on weekdays.
However, the announcement has attracted an outpouring of criticism, some directed at the Thai office and some at President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) New Southbound Policy.
The policy is aimed at reducing the nation’s economic dependence on China, which deepened under former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) leadership. It is also designed to soften the blow from Beijing’s punitive policies against the Tsai administration, notably the reduction in the number of Chinese tourists to Taiwan.
According to statistics compiled by the Tourism Bureau, more than 4.1 million Chinese tourists visited Taiwan in 2015, but the number has been declining since Tsai took office in 2016. It dropped to 3.5 million in 2016 and further to 2.7 million last year.
While it would be hard to make up for the decline, the Tsai administration has attempted to offset the impact by looking to Southeast Asia for a solution.
It is against this backdrop that the government introduced visa-free entry to Thais and Bruneians on a trial basis in August 2016 and to Filipinos in November last year. Last month, the trial periods were extended for another year due to the program’s success in attracting more tourists from the three nations.
Tourism Bureau statistics showed that the number of Thai tourists to Taiwan climbed from 124,409 in 2015 to 195,640 in 2016 and further to 292,534 last year. The number of Filipino tourists to Taiwan also surged from 139,217 in 2015 to 290,784 last year.
Those numbers are why Thailand Trade and Economic Office Executive Director Thongchai Chasawath said on Tuesday, and in an interview late last month with the Taipei Times, that he did not understand the government’s and public’s insistence on asking for reciprocal visa-free treatment from Bangkok.
Chasawath said Taiwan has also benefited greatly from waiving visas for Thai nationals, and that that alone should be reason enough to maintain its current policy, rather than “threatening to revoke the treatment if Thailand does not reciprocate.”
Although Chasawath’s comments might sound harsh, they are not entirely unreasonable.
As Minister Without Portfolio Chang Ching-sen (張景森), who is in charge of the nation’s visa-waiver program, said on Tuesday, any decisions by the government on the provision of visa-waiver privileges to another nation is based mainly on whether the measure will benefit itself and its people.
“The reason why we offer visa-free treatment to Thai citizens is because we want to attract more tourists from the country to Taiwan. As long as they are still coming here, there is a reason to maintain the policy,” Chang said.
It is true that Thailand should try harder to provide better visa treatment to Taiwanese, considering its popularity as a tourist destination for Taiwanese.
However, it is unwise to resort to populism in a bid to force the government to cancel its visa-waiver privilege to Thais simply because Taiwanese do not enjoy the same treatment. Such a move will only hurt the economy and make Taiwan’s pivot from China all the more difficult.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which