At 4:36am on Monday last week, a fire was reported in the hospice on the seventh floor of the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s Taipei Hospital in New Taipei City’s Sinjhuang District (新莊). Because only one nurse was on duty at the time, the fire resulted in nine deaths and injured 16 people, despite the alarm, emergency evacuation, fire extinguishing and fire prevention systems all being activated.
Every time something similar happens, officials apologize and say that they will identify the causes, but what happens after that? All the reviews and discussions fizzle out until the whole thing is repeated following the next disaster.
It must be stressed that a shortage of nurses means that emergency rescues cannot be swift and that this is a cause of many unnecessary deaths and injuries.
When will policymakers understand this and look at the problem from the perspective of patients and their families?
The fire is a reminder of the 2012 fire in the Beimen Sinying branch of Tainan Hospital, also run by the ministry, which resulted in 12 deaths. At the time, nighttime staffing needs were also discussed, but to this day, staffing regulations remain unchanged.
There have already been two big fires. How many more accidents affecting patient safety caused by staff shortages are needed before the ministry is willing to stipulate reasonable staffing regulations?
Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Hsueh Jui-yuan (薛瑞元) and Department of Nursing and Healthcare Director-General Tsai Shu-feng (蔡淑鳳) were quick to state that staffing at the hospital met requirements.
There were also reports that an assessment of the nursing home had just been passed by the hospital.
According to the regulations for staff at nursing homes, the installation standard is at least one nurse per 15 beds and one carer per five beds. Special attention should be given to the fact that the standard specification says “installation standard” and “nurse-to-bed ratio.”
These are two standards that the Taiwan Nurses Union are strongly opposed to, because the installation regulations only evaluate the initial installation at a medical institution and bases the need for nurses on the number of beds. At ward 7A at Taipei Hospital, there were 32 patients, and so only three nurses were required.
How does such an allocation allow for three shifts? This does not reflect the changes in the actual situation for frontline workers following the admission of a patient when one patient requires around-the-clock care, and one bed requires three different shifts every day.
In contrast to the installation standard and the nurse-to-bed ratio, the union has for many years called on policymakers to adopt a nurse-to-patient ratio as a benchmark. The concept means that the nurses on each shift care directly for a number of patients and that patients and their condition make up the framework for staff allocation, rather than determining the need for nurses based on the number of beds.
The ratio is the internationally recognized standard for nursing staff needs. An empirical study published in the US in 2002 of patients in need of acute care found that the addition of a single nurse lowered the death rate 30 days after surgery by 7 percent.
California and the Australian states of Victoria and Queensland have enshrined the nurse-to-patient ratio in law, making it an important policy for helping save lives.
As a result of cost cutting, hospitals have minimized staff on night shifts. The evaluation criteria only require an average based on all three shifts: day, evening and night. The day shift might be well-staffed, but staff are reduced during the evening and night shifts, and it even happens when monthly averages are submitted for evaluation.
When patients are close to death and their condition can and often does change constantly, that is not the time to play with numbers, even less with averages.
Regular nursing home fire drills test each detail of the standard procedure for reporting and responding in case of a fire. The question is how can the execution of such procedures be guaranteed when there is a shortage of staff?
Nurses are an asset, not a cost, and hospital operators must value the lives of patients.
The union is calling on the ministry to urgently enshrine the nurse-to-patient ratio in law, draw up a patient and nursing staff safety act, and abandon the installation standard and nurse-to-bed ratio, which are putting the safety and lives of patients at risk.
It calls instead for a focus on a mechanism to control nursing needs.
The nurse-to-patient ratio is of crucial importance to patients.
Lu Tzu-yen is a member of the Taiwan Nurses Union board. Chang Yu-an is president of Taiwan Nurses Union.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Local media reported earlier this month that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) criticized President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for referring to China as a “neighboring country,” saying that this is no different from a “two-state” model and that it amounts to changing the cross-strait “status quo.” I find it quite impossible to understand why civilized Taiwan continues to tolerate the existence of such a deceitful group that believes its own lies. The relationship between Taiwan and China is the relationship between two countries, and neither has any jurisdiction over the other — this is the undeniable “status quo.” Those who believe in the
With the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan, China has remarketed its East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) concerns. Beijing urged the Taliban to make a clean break with the movement and asked the US to blacklist it again. While some are still debating whether the movement exists, it is not the core of the matter because its existence neither justifies China’s Uighur policy nor sheds light on its concerns after the withdrawal of the US from Afghanistan. Is China really worried, and if so, is it because of the movement? This question needs to be answered. When Chinese officials first acknowledged
On Thursday, China applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) — a regional economic organization whose 11 member countries have a combined GDP of US$11 trillion. That is less than China’s 2019 GDP of US$14.34 trillion, so why is China so eager to join? China says there are two main reasons: To consolidate its foreign trade and foreign investment base, and to fast-track economic and trade relations between China and member countries of the CPTPP free-trade area. China’s bilateral trade with these countries grew from US$78 billion in 2003 to US$685.1 billion last year, mostly because of China’s 2005
US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) talked on the telephone on Thursday last week, the first time the two leaders have done so since Biden assumed the presidency. While each side sought to put their own gloss on the content of the conversation, some common ground did emerge. Biden reportedly said that both sides have a joint responsibility to ensure that competition between the US and China does not spiral into conflict and that there is no reason that the two nations are destined to fall into this trap. The day after the phone call, the Financial Times reported