No way to report dead birds
On Tuesday last week, I took a walk from Taipei’s Qilian toward New Taipei City’s Tamsui District (淡水), as I have many times before. Just before reaching Guandu Temple (關渡宮) I saw, at the riverside of the cycling and pedestrian path, a dead pigeon.
I thought that to be strange. I had never seen a dead bird on my walk before.
Some time later, just before the path splits into a branch that goes along the river and another that goes to the Zhuwei MRT station, I saw the remains of a fledgling.
I kept walking toward Hongshulin along the riverside path.
It might be more than a coincidence.
At Hongshulin I found the path closed so I turned back to Zhuwei along the path close to the MRT tracks. About 100m later I almost stepped on the carcass of a medium-sized bird.
When I got back home it was almost 6pm. I tried to communicate with both the Ministry of Health and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), but neither Web site seems to have a way of informing them of the situation, though both are willing to provide information on the avian flu.
I telephoned them, but my calls went unanswered after office hours; I guess no emergencies ever arise in Taiwan between 5:30pm and 9am.
The CDC has a Line account, but it turns out you cannot communicate with them.
So how does one report three unusual sightings of dead birds in an area in which there is supposed to be active surveillance for signs of avian flu?
Emilio Venezian
New Taipei City
Ban Chinese planes
If China places bans on airlines refusing to designate Taiwan as part of China, it would be appropriate for nations so threatened to place total bans on all Chinese airlines entering their airspace.
This would be a salutary lesson for Beijing and its bullying.
Gavan Duffy
Queensland, Australia
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS