The travel habits of Chinese are changing the world. Taking about 145 million overseas trips a year, China’s middle class is moving — and spending — more than that of any other nation: In 2016, they accounted for US$261 billion overseas, one-fifth of all sales by international tourists, the UN World Tourism Organization said.
To the south, India’s own swelling, moneyed middle class — 250 million smartphone-toting young professionals out of a population of 1.3 billion — is starting to emulate its regional rival. In less than 10 years, the World Travel and Tourism Council expects India to become the fourth-largest travel and tourism economy behind China, the US and Germany.
Although more people are visiting India than ever before — two decades ago about 2.4 million international tourists came to India a year; last year, there were five times that — the real boost is coming from domestic travel.
Illustration: Yusha
Almost 90 percent of travelers in India are Indians. For the past three years, their most popular destination has been the southernmost state of Tamil Nadu, thanks to pilgrims eager to visit its many temples.
Tourism in the subcontinent last year generated more than US$230 billion, up from almost US$209 billion in 2016.
The vast country offers myriad options: 36 world heritage sites and 103 national parks, plus the Taj Mahal in Agra, Rajasthan’s hill forts, the holy city of Varanasi, and everything else in between the mountains of the Himalayas and the beaches of Goa. Add in its jungles with tigers, elephants and the last of Asia’s lions, and no other country is better suited to take advantage of an adventure travel market that is expected to grow to US$1.3 billion by 2023.
“Indians are discovering their own country,” said Ahmed Chamanwala, founder of Fringe Ford, a five-room lodge in Kerala state, which sits on a 213 hectare forest home to more than 400 kinds of animals. “In our initial years, most of our tourists were inbound travelers, but over the years, we have seen an increase in the domestic weekend travelers from the major cities in India. Now the business is more dependent on the Indian market.”
THE PARADOX
However, as Venice, Barcelona and Dubrovnik have learned, unchecked growth can threaten stakeholders in the fragile places supported by the surge in visitors.
In India, steered by government subsidies and tax incentives, five regional budget airlines debuted 100 far-flung routes last year, helping fuel Indians’ desire to explore.
The country’s natural beauty is part of its marketing campaign and wildlife is a huge draw, but one concern being discussed in hushed tones is that the country’s weak infrastructure and stretched bureaucracy could allow certain areas to lose what makes them special before they ever reach their potential, Chamanwala said.
In some areas, tiger reserves no longer have tigers and nature safaris can feel like crowded parking lots, where there are more shutterbugs than subjects to shoot.
Fringe Ford is already taking steps to limit tourism’s effect.
The resort, sitting on an old tea plantation that has been reclaimed by the forest, is staffed with locals to keep the community involved as stakeholders.
Chamanwala plans to invest in adjacent plots to create a buffer that will encourage forest growth and conservation.
“Keeping the footprint to a bare minimum” is a must, he said, adding that he invests a portion of his profits into conservation on the property.
These worries are most pronounced in the high-altitude Himalaya desert of Ladakh in Jammu & Kashmir, a region on the extreme northern side of the country where dramatic peaks and native snow leopards have created a tourism explosion.
For years, the presence of the Indian army kept this region protected, but now almost 2.5 million visit annually, eager to see landscapes featured in Bollywood films.
Road construction there, a region long cut off from the rest of the continent, is a defiant message to neighboring China. As the one major broken link in China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the new roads are a directive to Indians: travel.
Throughout the Himalayas, the glaciers walling off the world’s tallest mountains from human encroachment are melting, opening more land for development. So far, much of the market has been from Indians, which presents enormous potential for international travelers.
Right now, there are about 650 hotels and homestays in a district with 4,300 households — too many for the land to support.
There is talk of capping visitors, but no standard regulations — and no one wants to turn off the money machine.
“I really hope they don’t expand their capacity,” said Himalayan Outback founder Misty Dhillon, who leads tours throughout Ladakh and greater India.
THE OTHER CATCH
Tourism in places such as Ladakh hinges on a pristine environmental image, but visitors produce thousands of kilograms of trash each year.
More than 30,000 plastic water bottles are dumped in open-air landfills in Ladakh each summer. On Mount Everest, in neighboring Nepal, there is an estimated 8 tonnes to 10 tonnes of everything from empty oxygen canisters to tents and even bodies.
Waste is a problem throughout the Himalayas and much of it is made by domestic travelers.
“The trash problem is a big concern, because our domestic tourism is a huge part of it,” Dhillon said. “People are seeing all these tourists coming for snow leopards and locals are thinking: ‘Why shouldn’t we do it?’”
In the meantime, wildlife is getting more difficult to spot. Glacial melt is speeding up the desertification of the Western Himalayas and increasing erosion, and trekkers hiking the mountains do not give alpine valleys a chance to recover.
David Sonam, co-owner of Snow Leopard Lodge in the Ladakhi village of Ulley, has been instrumental in implementing a resident program that levies a portion of each visitor fee to conservation, helping get locals involved.
Ulley, where Snow Leopard Lodge is located, has been fanatical about maintaining a low impact, limiting guests to 22 at the most, but even here, the relationship with the environment is tenuous.
The lodge is run by Tsewang Norboo, who once hunted snow leopards with his grandfather before turning his home into a hotel that has earned an outsize reputation, but no leopards means no tourists, a worry dictated by those same tourists.
It is the same issue that could happen in Varanasi, where liters of untreated sewage flow into the Ganges every day. The thing keeping the industry going threatens to crash it down.
“The land is changing,” Sonam said. “It’s changing because there are just too many people.”
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of