While FIFA World Cup fans pack Saint Petersburg Stadium fantasizing of soccer victory, Pyotr Voskresensky and fellow gay rights activists follow the matches in a quiet gallery across town decorated with beanbags and astroturf. They relish a different dream.
Voskresensky, an anesthesiologist who lost one job because of his homosexuality and fears losing another because he refuses to keep it secret, hopes that hosting the global tournament proves to Russians “that openness and tolerance can be a positive experience” and forces them to rethink hard-line attitudes toward the LGBT community.
As long as the tournament is under way, Russia is looking almost gay-friendly. The international scrutiny that comes with hosting the World Cup has forced Russian authorities to put their crackdown on LGBT activism on hold.
Illustration: Mountain People
A hotline for victims of anti-LGBT acts during the tournament has not received a single call so far.
Russian authorities did not bother prosecuting a British gay rights activist for protesting near the Kremlin and have allowed rainbow banners at multiple World Cup matches.
This little resembles the Russia that outlaws gay “propaganda” and shrugs off reports of gay people tortured in Chechnya. The Russia where anti-gay bullying at school is often condoned and anti-gay violence rarely punished. The Russia where waving a rainbow flag can lead to an arrest.
During the World Cup, “I can show myself even more publicly, because our city is hosting so many people — there is more information, more encounters, more possibilities,” said Andrei, who performs as “Star Vasha” in the Fame nightclub in Yekaterinburg, a tournament host city 1,400km east of Moscow.
He spoke on the condition that his last name not be used, fearing repercussions for those around him.
The big test comes after July 15, when the tournament ends and the crowds fly home. Will the World Cup leave a changed nation in its wake?
Some fear Russian police and militant groups will unleash pent-up frustration on the LGBT community as soon as the cameras turn away.
However, Voskresensky sees glimmers of hope and disagrees with those who favored boycotting Russia’s World Cup.
“It’s better to hold such events than to keep Russia ... cut off” from other cultures and ideas, he said.
He leads unofficial tours of Russia’s “gay history,” a 5km walk through Saint Petersburg that references gay figures such as composer Pyotr Tchaikovsky and traces centuries of czarist, Soviet and post-Soviet policy toward same-sex relations.
Russia’s 2013 law against gay “propaganda” toward minors makes it impossible to advertise his tours, because children might hear him talk. The law has been used to block gay rallies, limit funding and send a message to the larger public that it is all right to discriminate.
Voskresensky is a regular visitor to Saint Petersburg’s Diversity House, set up for the World Cup by a prominent group that campaigns against racism and anti-gay abuse in sports, the Fare Network.
Diversity House was evicted from its original facility just as the tournament started, but the group complained — and within 24 hours a new site had been found.
Russian authorities seem to be playing a careful game.
British activist Peter Tatchell was arrested while protesting near Red Square on the opening day of the World Cup, but was quickly released as images of the arrest spread online. A planned court hearing was quietly abandoned.
In Nizhny Novgorod’s stadium, stewards removed a rainbow banner put up by Di Cunningham and other members of British activist group 3LionsPride for the England-Panama match on June 24, but after a call to FIFA, those same stewards put it back up.
Cunningham has found Russian fans friendlier and more curious than she expected, saying that even the banner incident could raise awareness.
Perhaps those stewards “will start to wonder why it’s OK to put the banner inside the stadium, but it’s not OK to put it outside the stadium,” she said.
When her group unfurled the banner at the England-Tunisia match in Volgograd on June 19, a Russian fan “saw the banner from afar and came to us,” Cunningham said. “He suddenly realized it’s OK to be gay and a football fan... Maybe it’s raised his expectations of change.”
Vitaly Milonov, a lawmaker who played a key role in passing the gay “propaganda” law, said “sodomites” flying the rainbow flag had no place at the tournament.
While he is an extreme case, many ordinary Russians feel threatened by LGBT activism, seeing it as a form of Western depravity targeted at corrupting young Russians.
Such anti-gay attitudes are not unique to Russia, but things are changing.
For the first time, FIFA is using anti-discrimination experts to monitor World Cup games, and the Mexican and Argentine soccer federations have been fined for offensive behavior by fans, including anti-gay chants and slurs.
What happens to Russia’s LGBT community after the tournament will offer a lesson to FIFA as it looks ahead to the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, a nation where gay sex is illegal.
In Russia, being gay is legal, but admitting it is fraught with professional and personal risk.
The 2013 law encourages rhetoric that has made “the LGBT community be afraid, be silent,” said Jonny Dzhibladze, coordinator at Saint Petersburg-based LGBT group Coming Out, which has tracked more than 300 incidents of anti-gay violence or abuse in the city in the past few years. “The most dangerous part of this law is that it practically gives free rein to those who commit crimes, murders and physical violence motivated by homophobia and transphobia.”
“On the one hand, it’s strange that the World Cup is taking place in Russia,” Dzhibladze said. “At the same time ... it gives an opportunity for the society to get in contact, to get informed.”
A boycott “would only contribute to isolation,” he added.
Additional reporting by Irina Titova and Vadim Ghirda
Recent global media coverage of Taiwan has at times reduced the nation’s success in containing the spread of COVID-19 to some East Asian values such as cooperation with social control or Confucianism. An article in Wired magazine debunks this myth, crediting the nation’s success to democracy and transparency. It is appalling to learn that this misconception still exists. Here is one thing that world citizens should keep in mind: Taiwan is the first and only country in Asia that has legalized same-sex marriage. There is nothing Confucian about that. If anything, the Confucian legacy is a major obstacle that Taiwanese
The novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 — or the Wuhan virus, after the Chinese city from which it emerged — could not have come at a more advantageous time for China’s communist government. Not for the Chinese people, of course, thousands of whom have perished because of Beijing’s lack of transparency, disinformation and cruel refusal to cooperate with international public health organizations. No, the advantage goes exclusively to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), whose deceptive practices unleashed the deadly virus to the world. To understand how Beijing benefits from the pandemic, it is necessary
Although concerned over the impact of many citizens returning from Europe and the US while those nations cope with soaring COVID-19 infection rates, Taiwan has handled the pandemic with alacrity and seems to be successfully managing the process compared with many others, including European nations and the US. Despite its proximity to China, by March 3, Taiwan had only 42 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and one death, while Japan had 287 cases and six deaths and South Korea had 4,812 cases and 28 deaths. This is of considerable interest internationally because Taiwan is not only located near China, but is relatively densely
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), tasked with reforming the party and returning it to the viable political force that it once was, is faced with a Gordian knot. The complexities of the job ahead go beyond appealing to a younger generation of voters. Chiang might have to decide between jettisoning much of what the party originally stood for and preparing it for a return to the Presidential Office, or doubling down on its founding purpose and representing what is increasingly, in the current state of Taiwanese politics, a minority view. The KMT, as the founding party and self-proclaimed champion