On Monday last week, US President Donald Trump announced that he had directed the US Department of Defense to immediately establish a new military branch — a “Space Force” — to ensure that the US maintains a military advantage in space and avoids being overtaken in extraterrestrial affairs by other nations such as China.
When China launched its first domestic communications satellite into space in 1970 — the Dong Fang Hong I — it became the world’s fifth nation capable of sending a satellite into orbit around the Earth.
In 1981, China’s Feng Bao 1 carrier rocket launched three satellites into space. In 2015, Long March 6, one of a new generation of Chinese carrier rockets, deployed 20 satellites into their designated orbits in one launch.
All these successes make it clear that China possesses the capability to wage war in space.
There is a clear national strategic goal and military ambition behind all of China’s technological developments in space, and it has never been a matter of simply wishing to explore space or to serve its people’s well-being and business purposes.
A statement published in the People’s Liberation Army Daily in 2014 provides all the evidence that is needed to prove this point: “Whoever is able to control space will hold the dominant position on Earth; whoever holds the dominant position on Earth will seize the war initiative.”
A National Defense Report released by the Ministry of National Defense in Taipei in October 2015 said that all of the military satellites China has launched into orbit over the past few years have given the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) round-the-clock military command, as well as control and intelligence transfer capabilities.
These satellites are also capable of supporting long-range missions carried out by the PLA in areas west of the first island chain.
Furthermore, the Beidou satellite navigation system deployed by China provides coverage of the West Pacific into the Indian Ocean, effectively improving real-time target surveillance, as well as the accuracy of long-range precision strikes.
In addition to continuing the traditional joint military drills between the army, navy and air force, the ministry and national security authorities should also conduct in-depth studies into reactionary and preventive measures to guard against the possibility of the PLA deploying the weapons it has developed — such as satellite killers, laser weapons and GPS jamming equipment — in a cross-strait conflict.
Possible scenarios include the PLA launching anti-satellite missiles at Taiwanese satellites in orbit, which would comprehensively destroy military precision and telecommunications systems in Taiwan.
The PLA’s potential deployment of satellites for military purposes should be another vital aspect of simulations when conducting military drills.
Yao Chung-yuan is former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s Strategic Planning Department and an adjunct university professor.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming.
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
RSS