The historic summit between US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Singapore has sent a new political message to the world: That two nations extremely opposed to each other, the large democratic state of capitalism and the small authoritarian state of communism, are walking toward peace after ending more than half a century of hostility. This is expected to affect not only Northeast Asia, but also the world. Despite certain variables, they are still making the effort to make it work.
It seems like only yesterday when conflict between North and South Korea was on the verge of breaking out, and tension in Northeast Asia was as high as that of Middle East. In the twinkling of an eye, the two unpredictable national leaders signed a memorandum for peace while shaking hands with a smile.
Singapore has a population of only about 5.8 million, including Chinese, Malays and Indians. Different from the traditional Chinese society that many ethnic Chinese are used to, it projects the image of a modern nation. It is not a fully democratic state, as its “rule of law” is beyond people’s freedom. On the basis of a cultural view influenced by British colonial rule, the shared community of a multiethnic society was constructed in Singapore.
Taiwan is in a similar situation, but it is trapped by Chinese ideology that has remained unresolved to this day. Although it has a population of about 23 million, the conditions for a normal country have not taken shape, leaving its citizens in a state of anxiety.
The outbreak of the Korean War in the 1950s led to US assistance in defending Taiwan, which was ruled by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime that took over Taiwan on behalf of the Allied Powers. Taiwan stayed safe during the Cold War while developing its economy based on the industrial infrastructure of Japanese colonial rule. However, it did not reaffirm Taiwan’s national status again. Since the Republic of China (ROC) was replaced by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) at the UN, the predicament of Taiwan’s national status has constantly existed. Even transfers of power have failed to solve the problem.
The KMT regime did not let Taiwanese recognize the country named the ROC through self-determination, nor did it let the ROC be reborn by making a new constitution. With the KMT’s party-state hijacker-like attitude, it denied all efforts to turn Taiwan into a new country. Since the ROC has been continuously entangled with the PRC, divergence in national identity has arisen. So a shared love for statehood does not exist, despite the democratization and liberalization of Taiwan.
North and South Korea are now walking toward peace together. Perhaps they are able to do so because both are UN member states. The ROC was expelled by the PRC from China. In the beginning, it was lucky to survive as a nation thanks to the Korean War, but its existence is today connected to Taiwan’s destiny. From anti-China in the past to pro-China, it has always wanted to hijack and threaten the people on the land that it occupies.
The KMT sometimes compares the ROC and PRC to North and South Korea. However, the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party are not two kingdoms separated by the Yangtze River in China, and such a metaphor is odd. The “status quo” has become some kind of shackle that suffocates Taiwan’s chance for a breakthrough and even rebirth. It is time to change the “status quo.”
If the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) refuses to change it, Taiwanese seeking to build a new nation might lose their passion for the DPP government and become anxious. The world is changing and Taiwan should break through the “status quo” as well.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms