The reverberations of China’s requests to 44 airlines that they change how they refer to Taiwan have continued to manifest themselves, as Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airways on Monday submitted to China’s wish and changed their online listings for Taiwan to “Taiwan, China.”
However, there is still time for the 20 or more airlines that have caved to the unreasonable demand to reverse their actions before China’s July 25 ultimatum.
The “request” made last month by China’s Civil Aviation Administration comes with a postscript in the form of a statement, which says that the agency would “closely monitor” the airlines’ progress to “correct and improve” the way they list Taiwan on their Web sites.
The letter’s tone insinuates that there could be negative consequences if the airlines do not comply, making the “request” seem more like a threat.
However, there is little cause for panic. After all, what could China do if none of the airlines agree to carry out its whimsical wish? Will it embarrass itself by asking all Chinese to boycott the 44 airlines? This unlikely scenario would only make China lose face, which is the last thing Beijing wants.
Therefore, it is high time that the airlines call China’s bluff and say: “That’s it. We are not taking any more of this nonsense.”
Granted, China, with its 1.4 billion people, is a lucrative market whose business few airlines would want to lose, but if no one had paid any attention to China’s demand, everyone would have been able to retain full autonomy over their services and the pressure would have dissipated over time.
Meanwhile, the governments overseeing the 20 or more airlines that have acquiesced to China’s demand need to realize that the implications of remaining silent run much deeper than what they might have assumed: It means that they have allowed China to interfere with their companies’ operations and to meddle in their domestic affairs.
These governments could look to the White House when devising a response to China’s demand. US President Donald Trump’s administration denounced the demand as “Orwellian nonsense,” adding that Trump “will stand up for Americans resisting efforts by the Chinese Communist Party to impose Chinese political correctness on American companies and citizens.”
Taiwan is a de facto nation with a fully functioning government, which explains why China jumps at every opportunity to threaten innocent third parties to cover up that fact.
However, demanding that international airlines change the way they refer to Taiwan is hardly the most shocking piece of news about China’s bullying.
Last month, ABC News reported that two Australian high-school students of Taiwanese descent in Rockhampton, Queensland, saw their art — two barramundi-shaped Republic of China flags on a cattle statue to support a joint initiative between the Rockhampton Regional Council and Beef Australia to promote the local cattle industry — painted over by the council, which expressed concern that the flags would irritate China, one of Australia’s biggest export destinations.
News like this belies Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) 2014 statement that China is a “peaceful, amiable and civilized lion,” and poses the question: Is it China’s goal to elicit anger or ridicule through its actions to sideline Taiwan? What has it gained through such actions?
Perhaps Presidential Office spokesman Sidney Lin (林鶴明) said it best when responding to the Japanese airlines’ Web site change: “Such a move does not change the fact that Taiwan is a nation. It will only alienate people on the two sides of the Taiwan Strait and cost China the respect it has in the international community.”
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released