Almost any foreign official, businessman or journalist visiting Beijing has heard the mantra that China cannot be expected to open up its markets or meet more stringent international standards because it is still a developing economy.
Maybe that argument was valid 20 years ago. Now it is increasingly tenuous. More importantly, it is damaging to China and the world.
Pleading poverty ignores the tremendous economic progress China has made in the past few decades. When China joined the WTO in 2001, it was the world’s sixth-largest economy and at an early stage of reorganizing state-owned enterprises to compete globally.
China is now the world’s second-largest economy and its largest trading nation. It is home to some of the largest globally competitive firms, last year accounting for 115 of the Fortune 500 largest companies in the world.
China has moved up the global value chain dramatically, with a world-class export sector bigger than that of any other G20 economy. It boasts a large high-tech market and technology firms that are fast becoming global leaders. The country has been granted the largest number of patents globally since 2015.
More than half of its population — about 700 million people — use smartphones. As of September last year, China had the second-largest number of unicorns after the US: about 98 companies.
True, while China’s per capita income last year reached US$8,830, up eight-fold from 2001, it is still well below the World Bank’s US$12,236 threshold for high-income countries. However, this measure is misleading. Already an upper-middle-income nation, China has a high-income country living inside of it.
More than 200 million Chinese live in high-income areas, including the cities of Beijing, Tianjin and Shanghai, and the powerhouse coastal provinces of Jiangsu and Zhejiang.
Jiangsu alone has a population of 80 million people and per capita GDP of almost US$17,000 — greater than Argentina, Chile and Hungary. Shenzhen’s 12 million residents boast a per capita GDP of more than US$27,000 in nominal terms.
China has also become systemically important financially in a way few other countries are. It houses the world’s largest banking system, second-largest equity markets and third-largest bond market, and is promoting a larger international role for the yuan.
In the past few years, China has become the world’s largest net exporter of capital; its policy banks have extended more lending to developing economies than all of the multilateral development banks combined.
Ignoring or minimizing all these facts does China more harm than good. Chinese leaders act as though companies still need to be protected from global competition: The country remains the most closed G20 member, as measured by investment restrictions and ease of doing business.
Foreign investment is blocked in many key sectors, such as cloud-computing services, even as China’s three biggest tech firms have all made major cloud services investments in the US in the past few years.
This situation — where Chinese firms take advantage of open export and investment opportunities around the world, but enjoy a significantly protected market at home — is unsustainable. It is putting support for the broader global trading system at risk and spurring not just the US, but several European nations to consider new barriers to Chinese investment. China has as much to lose as anyone from escalating trade tensions.
As in the global trading system, China has yet to adjust to its newfound importance in financial markets. A Bloomberg Economics study found that China’s central bank was among the least transparent in the G20, with the greatest number of market surprises.
A 2016 IMF assessment noted that “while data are broadly adequate for surveillance, they are only barely so, and are not commensurate with China’s systemic importance.”
Such opacity presents an underappreciated global systemic risk.
Meanwhile, China’s resistance to transparency in overseas lending could prove costly at home. Its insistence on clinging to “South-South” cooperation prevents China from joining groups like the Paris Club to better coordinate with other major official creditors.
As China is the largest lender to many highly indebted countries, that could complicate any international efforts to support these economies and leave Chinese taxpayers to foot the bill in case of defaults.
Perhaps most importantly, China’s main challenge now is escaping the middle-income trap — to become an advanced, innovation-driven economy. That is going to require a different set of policies than China pursued in its initial development stages. Enhancing productivity will require opening up its largely state-controlled and inefficient services sector.
Although China has gotten better about protecting intellectual property rights as it has ascended the value chain, it still has a ways to go.
Access to global markets will remain essential. To prevent frictions with developing countries along its Belt and Road Initiative, China will need to open its markets more to their goods.
Likewise, the “Made in China 2025” initiative will continue to engender a backlash from advanced economies, limiting China’s access to their technologies, unless China loosens its own restrictions.
Chinese leaders certainly are not wrong to focus on building a “prosperous society” and improving the lives of all its citizens. However, the best way to do so is to acknowledge how far along that path China has already come.
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
The international community was shocked when Israel was accused of launching an attack on Lebanon by rigging pagers to explode. Most media reports in Taiwan focused on whether the pagers were produced locally, arousing public concern. However, Taiwanese should also look at the matter from a security and national defense perspective. Lebanon has eschewed technology, partly because of concerns that countries would penetrate its telecommunications networks to steal confidential information or launch cyberattacks. It has largely abandoned smartphones and modern telecommunications systems, replacing them with older and relatively basic communications equipment. However, the incident shows that using older technology alone cannot
RSS