Five o’clock in the morning and the young woman’s eyelids are drooping. All night she has been removing spots of dust from Amazon smart speakers with a toothbrush. Time seems to crawl. Now she is overwhelmed with exhaustion.
She works on, more and more slowly, until she can do no more. She looks around the workshop. Other workers have rested their heads on the bench. She slumps forward and falls asleep.
Let us call the young woman Alexa. Alexa, what are you doing here? For an answer, we must fast forward a couple of months to Monday last week.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is an overcast morning in the city of Hengyang, in China’s Hunan Province. More than 7 million people live in this city, the second-largest in the province. It is known locally as the Wild Goose City for the birds that used to stop off on their southerly migration, but many people even within China would struggle to find it on a map.
The morning is warm, but overcast, with a light haze that could be fog or pollution. The road to the Foxconn factory in Baishazhou Industrial Park is wide and lined with well-cared-for plants. There is a steady stream of cars, motorbikes and buses heading toward the factory, which sits back from the road behind a large gate. Blue-uniformed security staff keep watch on those coming in and the street outside.
Dozens of workers are arriving, casually dressed in jeans and T-shirts. Most are young and there is a good mixture of women and men. Ahead of them lies a 60-hour week, eight regular hours for five days, plus two more of overtime each day and another 10 on Saturday.
They are to be expected to hit tough targets and must ask permission to use the toilets. The overtime — up to 80 hours a month — is far in excess of the 36 hours stipulated in Chinese labor laws, but companies can and do seek exemptions and workers want the overtime, to boost their basic pay.
These are the people who are making the smart speakers and tablets that Amazon hopes to make a fixture in millions more homes around the world this year: the Echo and Echo Dot — which both spring to life when the user addresses them as Alexa — and the Kindles.
It has been a year since Amazon sealed a deal with Foxconn — known as Hon Hai Precision Industry in Taiwan — to ramp up its hardware production in Hengyang, with the firm reportedly adding 30 new production lines and creating 15,000 jobs.
Foxconn is China’s largest single private employer, and in March it reported a 4.2 percent increase in profits, with net income rising to ￡1.84 billion (US$2.47 billion) in the last three quarters of last year.
Profits for the first quarter of this year were ￡605 million and its chief executive, Terry Gou (郭台銘), has a fortune reported to be about ￡5.3 billion, but it is said to be keen to diversify to reduce its reliance on Apple and it is investing heavily in the Hengyang plant to meet the demand from Amazon.
The Foxconn factory in Hengyang relies on the tried and tested formula of low wages and long hours, but here there is another element: the extensive use of agency workers who do not have the security of a regular job.
These employees — known as dispatch workers in China — are hired from labor companies as an off-the-shelf workforce. They are generally slightly better-paid than permanent members of staff, but they get no sick pay or holiday pay, and can be laid off without any pay at all during quiet months when production drops off.
In some ways, they resemble the Amazon products they are making: wanted one day and discarded the next.
However, the increasing reliance on a disposable workforce by companies has alarmed the Chinese government, and in 2014 it changed its labor laws to limit dispatch workers to just 10 percent of a company’s staff — and then only to cover temporary work. Companies were expected to fill most positions with regular staff on employment contracts.
The wage slips pinned to the walls of the Foxconn factory in Hengyang suggest that the message might be taking some time to get through: They show that about 40 percent of the workforce in the Hengyang plant are bought in from agencies. These are the workers on whom Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is relying to further entrench his position as the world’s richest man.
Bezos is worth an estimated US$138.8 billion, a fortune he acquired against a backdrop of global reports of misery for Amazon’s warehouse workers, exhausted by the demands made on them in return for the most basic of wages.
Unions and labor rights groups have protested about low pay and harsh working conditions, and three delivery firms used by Amazon are facing a legal challenge from the GMB union, demanding that gig economy delivery drivers receive sick and holiday pay.
Last month it was revealed that ambulances had been called 600 times to Amazon’s UK warehouses over the past three years. There have been repeated calls for Amazon to improve the lot of its workers.
However, Bezos does not see the need. Collecting an award for “outstanding personalities who are particularly innovative and who generate and change markets, influence culture and at the same time face up to their responsibility to society” a couple months ago, he was questioned about the controversies surrounding the way he made his money.
“When you’re criticized, first look in the mirror and decide: Are your critics right? If they are right, change. Don’t resist,” he said.
However, Bezos’ mirror apparently showed him that his critics were wrong.
“I’m very proud of our working conditions and very proud of the wages we pay,” he told the audience gathered to fete him.
And now he and Gou have brought that same formula to Hengyang, but what draws two of the world’s richest men to set up in a city far from the big manufacturing hubs of Shenzhen, Shanghai, Tianjin and Guangzhou, with their easy access to shipping and huge industrial bases?
For an answer, it helps to know that Alexa is working for 14.5 yuan (US$2.27) an hour. That is US$1.34 less than the US$3.61 national average for a factory worker in China.
Foxconn could not pay her so little in Shenzhen, where the legal minimum wage is 19.5 yuan an hour, or in Shanghai, where it is 20 yuan.
Some days, Alexa gets to work overtime, but when she opens her wage slip at the end of the month she will be disappointed, because she and her fellow dispatch workers are paid only the same 14.5 yuan rate that they get for the main shift, instead of the time-and-a-half stipulated by Chinese labor law and Amazon’s own supplier code of conduct.
Foxconn promises agency workers a minimum of 3,700 yuan a month, but pay slips and workers’ own accounts suggest real wages rarely get close to that figure.
Most earn between 2,000 and 3,000 yuan, with permanent staff earning between 2,000 and 2,500 yuan. Last year, the average wage for a worker in Hengyang was 4,647 yuan a month.
Pay rates have rocketed in China in recent years, but Hunan remains one of the provinces with the lowest wages, and the minimum in Hengyang — 1,280 yuan a month — is barely half that in Shenzhen, where Foxconn’s Apple factory is based.
That Shenzhen factory has been the subject of years of criticism for its treatment of staff manufacturing iPhones and other Apple devices, with 14 suicides in 2010 prompting the installation of netting around the factory dormitories to catch workers jumping from the roofs.
Now rewind again, back to March. It is early evening and Alexa is getting off the bus and entering the factory for the night shift. She has secured a job as a dispatch worker through the Qizhong labor company — one of six supplying the factory — and has joined the production line making Amazon’s mini smart speaker, the Echo Dot.
Alexa looks much like the other young women around her, but she has a secret: Alexa has been sent in undercover by the US-based labor rights investigator China Labor Watch (CLW) to find out what is going on behind the security gate.
It is the first time anyone has investigated Amazon’s production lines, and CLW has teamed up with the Observer (and the Sunday Mirror) to publish the findings.
Its own report — Amazon Profits from Secretly Oppressing its Supplier’s Workers — was published online on Saturday last week.
Alexa is early, like all the other workers. They know that they must leave time to clear security and be at their workstations for the 8pm start, although they will not be paid for turning up early. She notices that the temperature inside the workshops is noticeably higher than outside and the anti-static gloves she has to wear quickly make her hands sweat.
Every day when she returns to the company dormitory she shares with five other women, she jots down what she has seen in her diary: the monotonous work; the colleagues complaining about sore backs and the bright lights that make their eyes tired; the overwhelming sense of exhaustion. She writes that workers must ask permission from a supervisor to go to the toilet and how some workers are left in tears when they are told off by their line manager.
Today, Alexa has to clean 1,400 Echo Dot speakers with a toothbrush dipped in rubbing alcohol to remove any specks of dust. Four-and-a-half hours into the shift, she is already flagging.
“I was already so tired and my movements grew slower,” she wrote. “I brushed with less and less force. There were 20 or 30 speakers building up in front of me that I had yet to brush clean.”
“The speakers that remained to be cleaned kept building up in front of me. The line technician came over and told me to brush faster and that my movements were too slow ... but I no longer had any strength,” she said.
Another day, she chats to an older woman sitting opposite her.
“The woman across from me said that she had been brushing for so long that her hand was growing numb, her neck was sore, her back was sore, her eyes couldn’t see clearly and her vision was getting worse,” she wrote.
Another worker tells her she is also suffering: “While working at the same work position and doing the same motions over and over again each day, she felt exhausted and her back was sore and her neck, back and arms could barely take it any more.”
Alexa’s diary makes no happier reading the following day. A woman of about 45 tells her how she has been scolded because she is not fast enough: “It might be because she was getting older so her speed was slower and her reactions were slower. When the line leader was telling her off, she started crying. After I returned to the dorm, an older woman said that last time the line leader told her off, she also cried.”
She describes long nights of repetitive and relentless work, with fellow workers close to falling asleep on their feet.
During a break at about midnight, she sees that “many people were resting on the assembly line and sleeping, while others had pushed together some chairs and were sleeping on those. Some had even stacked together some foam boards and slept on top of them.”
She finds little relief on returning to the dormitories, where she writes that there is no emergency escape plan in case of fire and “escape routes are unlabeled.”
Workers complain about the living conditions, including leaks in the roof and lights in the showers not working.
Alexa’s diary records her own frustrations on the production line and how she is overwhelmed by tiredness: “In my mind, I was both furious and lamenting as my hands continued the repetitive motions. My hands started feeling sore, but I managed to make it to 3am.”
“Around 4am, the workers across from me stopped working. I continued observing. The workers across from me told me I didn’t need to watch anymore, as the quota had already been reached,” she said. “At this time, I saw that some of the people in the work positions behind us had also stopped and were sitting due to lack of work. I felt very tired so I rested my head on the assembly line. After a while, the line technician came over and tapped me and said I couldn’t sleep on the assembly line, so I sat up again.”
At the end of the shift, Alexa leaves the workshop and goes to collect her phone from her locker: “There were a lot of people squatting or sitting on the curbside, eating a boxed lunch or playing with their phones. They all looked exhausted.”
Talk in the factory is of agency workers being laid off without pay during quiet periods: 700 in April and last month, and 2,700 in January and February.
However, among the workers there is no great simmering anger, no burning resentment. Few have heard of Amazon or Bezos. They are not expecting very much and are not particularly disappointed when not very much is exactly what Foxconn and Amazon give them.
One 32-year-old married man said he can earn a basic 2,000 yuan a month making Kindles, but even with overtime taking it up to about US$422, it is not enough.
“Currently, the wages are very low. I hope to be able to earn around 3,000 to 5,000 yuan a month, although I doubt I can earn this on a consistent basis,” he said.
At least it is better than being a dispatch worker, he said — “The factory just fires them.”
However, a 19-year-old dispatch worker disagreed. He said he could earn 145 yuan a day if he works a couple of hours’ overtime and just accepts it when he is laid off: “The factory will schedule holidays for dispatch workers. About half a month to a month. I just stay at home. It is OK.”
It is really not OK, though, CLW executive director Li Qiang (李強) said.
He last month wrote to Bezos, setting out the investigation’s findings and challenging the hiring of more than 40 percent of the workforce from agencies.
“This violates Chinese labor law. Foxconn uses a large number of dispatch workers and violates workers’ interests via these dispatch companies. This practice is unethical and illegal,” he wrote. “I hope that you can compel your suppliers to improve their working situations and to manufacture Amazon products under ethical conditions.”
However, Amazon already knew this, because Alexa was not the only person running a ruler over the Foxconn factory in March. Amazon said that its own auditors also visited and picked up “two issues of concern” — the high volume of dispatch workers and the illegal underpayment of overtime. Foxconn was told to fix it.
Amazon head of worldwide sustainability Kara Hartnett Hurst responded to Li’s concerns, telling him: “Amazon takes reported violations of our supplier code of conduct extremely seriously.
“Amazon recognizes our responsibility to ensure the well-being of factory workers manufacturing products for Amazon,” she added.
The company has a code of conduct for suppliers and it used independent auditors to inspect its suppliers, who were expected to respond to any issues identified, she said.
Last year, Bezos announced that he was considering a philanthropy strategy, “helping people in the here and now — short term — at the intersection of urgent need and lasting impact.”
Apparently short of inspiration and unable to think of anything close to home, he took to Twitter to ask for suggestions.
Saturday’s report suggests he might have been better off just asking Alexa.
In the closing weeks of 2000, an army of Singaporean government officials descended on Washington to make good on a handshake between then-US President Bill Clinton and Singaporean Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟). They had agreed to strike an FTA after a round of golf in Brunei that past November. Running a small city-state, Singapore’s leaders and their diplomats live with their ear to the ground, attuned to the slightest geopolitical movements. They were motivated then by a big-picture strategic concern — keeping the US embedded in their region. An FTA they thought would help do that. It worked. Clinton’s successor,
On Oct. 7, the Chinese embassy in New Delhi sent letters to the Indian media asking them to refrain from calling Taiwan a country while reporting on its 109th National Day, which fell on Saturday last week. This move backfired and, on the contrary, contributed to the immense popularity of Taiwan among Indians, leading to an outpouring of congratulations for it on Twitter. Asked about the letter, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs said: “There is a free media that reports on issues as it sees fit.” Bharatiya Janata Party spokesman Tajinder Singh Bagga put up several banners outside the
On Oct. 6, the UN Committee on Human Rights released a statement on the concentration camps in China’s Xinjiang region in which at least 1 million Uighurs and other ethnic minorities are incarcerated. On the same day, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was telling delegates at a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) meeting that “happiness among the people in Xinjiang is on the rise.” It was a stark reminder of the CCP’s longstanding practice of trampling on human rights and deceiving the world. In October last year, the Taiwan East Turkestan Association and the Taiwan Friends of Tibet held an event titled
In a Facebook post on Wednesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) wrote: “The KMT must fall for Taiwan to improve.’ Allow me to ask the question again: Is this really true?” It matters not how many times Hsu asks the question, my answer will always be the same: “Yes, the KMT must be toppled for Taiwan to improve.” In the lengthy Facebook post, titled “What were those born in the 1980s guilty of?” Hsu harked back to the idealistic aspirations of the 2014 Sunflower movement before heaping opprobrium on the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP)