The Dominican Republic’s severing of diplomatic ties with Taiwan earlier this month is another reminder of the way in which a rising China leverages its economic might and international influence to constrict Taiwan’s space in the international arena.
Beijing spends enormous sums of money on development assistance to lure away Taiwan’s diplomatic allies. It coerces Taiwanese public opinion through scare tactics and forces other nations to accept its so-called “one China” principle to obstruct a “one China, one Taiwan” solution and strip Taiwan of its sovereignty.
This means that all international channels are blocked off unless Taiwan is able to obtain China’s permission. Beijing is using a combination of economic and political means in a bid to snuff out the Republic of China and the idea of an independent nation called Taiwan.
As Taiwan faces the prospect of China’s transformation into a major power and its increasing international influence, it must also prepare itself for long-term autocratic rule by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), after he increased his power in March by forcing through the abolishment of constitutional presidential term limits.
From a long-term perspective, to deal with Beijing’s offensive tactics — poaching Taiwanese companies and talent, freezing Taiwan out of the international diplomatic community and intimidating the nation militarily — Taiwan must be on guard against China’s nimble use of the “carrot-and-stick” approach.
The government must study and understand internal changes within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the effect that they could have on the Taiwan Strait. It also needs to constrict China’s ability to poach Taiwanese companies and talent, and must prioritize innovation with a greater sense of urgency.
In terms of the economy and defense, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration must continue the drive to become more self-sufficient.
Taiwanese sovereignty is an extremely sensitive issue for Beijing, which naturally plans to use its economic advantage to achieve its diplomatic needs.
For decades, China’s Taiwan policy has focused on achieving unification. To that end, Beijing has started using economic incentives to target groups in Taiwan as part of its “united front” tactics in a kind of economic war designed to buy up Taiwan, hollow out its economy and isolate the nation.
The inevitable consequence of this for Taiwan would be a weakened economy, but also increased dependence on China.
In short, Beijing plans to use its economic might to place Taiwan in a straitjacket.
The CCP is adept at applying its unification strategy and divide-and-rule politics. It has used military intimidation to wage psychological warfare on Taiwan and to consolidate the party’s authority within China. It also uses external events to divert the public’s focus from political problems at home — a tactic on which the CCP has always relied.
The party uses a triumvirate of warfare on public opinion, psychological warfare and legal warfare to achieve its political goals, capitalizing on society’s increasing use of the Internet, big data and instantaneous communication to increase its effectiveness.
As such, propaganda involving military exercises is likely to become even more pointed and effective, as the war on public opinion becomes even more multifaceted.
The CCP is also good at using the carrot-and-stick approach.
During a regular air and sea long-range exercise, it can arbitrarily announce exercises aimed at Taiwan, pick a land-based troop exercise in a coastal area and combine the two into a set of joint exercises.
The intent is to show that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is militarily superior to Taiwan, and to stress that its aircraft can circle and harass Taiwan at will.
With today’s global interconnectivity and the comprehensive power of national armies, the cost to China of taking military action against Taiwan would be too high — it could not initiate military action lightly.
China is engaging in psychological warfare to intimidate Taiwan through the use of military displays and to show that war is an extension of politics.
The law of the jungle is not the way to resolve the cross-strait issue. It should be settled through free competition provided by democratic systems — for anyone on the right side of history, it is not difficult to see what drives the situation.
Taiwan should speed up its global deployment and integration with the international community, no matter the outcome in the Strait. The nation needs a flexible China policy, sustainable and prosperous economic development, stable alliances and active exchanges with other nations — all important components of continued cross-strait peace.
The nation’s defenses are well prepared for a long war, making military action against Taiwan a risky proposition for China. This is the basic status of the geopolitical situation in the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan must continue to strengthen its self-defense capabilities and remain aware of China’s military activities in the Taiwan Strait, which have lately comprised psychological warfare.
It must also help maintain a regional balance militarily and use its deterrent capabilities to maintain a secure Taiwan Strait.
Chang Yan-ting is an adjunct professor at National Defense University.
Translated by Edward Jones and Perry Svensson
The Cabinet on Nov. 6 approved a NT$10 billion (US$318.4 million) four-year plan to build tourism infrastructure in mountainous areas and the south. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) on Tuesday announced that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications would offer weekday accommodation discounts, birthday specials and other domestic travel incentives beginning next March, aiming to encourage more travel outside the usual weekend and holiday peaks. The government is right to focus on domestic tourism. Although the data appear encouraging on the surface — as total domestic trips are up compared with their pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers — a closer look tells a different
For more than seven decades, the Chinese Communist Party has claimed to govern Tibet with benevolence and progress. I have seen the truth behind the slogans. I have listened to the silences of monks forbidden to speak of the Dalai Lama, watched the erosion of our language in classrooms, and felt the quiet grief of a people whose prayers are monitored and whose culture is treated as a threat. That is why I will only accept complete independence for Tibet. The so-called “autonomous region” is autonomous in name only. Decisions about religion, education and cultural preservation are made in Beijing, not
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
I recently watched a panel discussion on Taiwan Talks in which the host rightly asked a critical question: Why is the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) spearheading a robust global movement to reject China’s ongoing distortion of UN Resolution 2758? While the discussion offered some context, a more penetrating analysis and urgent development was missed. The IPAC action is not merely a political gesture; it is an essential legal and diplomatic countermeasure to China’s escalating and fundamentally baseless campaign to manufacture a claim over Taiwan through the deliberate misinterpretation of a 1971 UN resolution. Since the inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as