Thirty minutes after major maintenance on the No. 2 reactor at the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里) on May 16, 2016, an explosion occurred in the lightning arrester box and the generator was taken offline. Six hundred and eighty days later, the generator was restarted — not without controversy — but only 24.5 hours later a safety mechanism was tripped following a warning given by the reactor’s neutron detection system.
The next day, groups that support nuclear power use proposed a referendum to “protect the environment through nuclear power.”
“To avoid the non-nuclear homeland policy causing air pollution and an ecological catastrophe, Article 95, Clause 1 of the Electricity Act (電業法) [Which says that ‘the nuclear-energy-based power-generating facilities shall wholly stop running by 2025’] should be abolished. To end the policy of the non-nuclear homeland, the nuclear generators should be restarted, to guarantee the public’s freedom of access to electricity, without imposing controls on electricity or having power cuts, and to ensure inexpensive electricity,” the referendum proposal says.
There is no mention of the development of “green” energy. The group could simply call the referendum “extending the life of nuclear power” instead of dressing it up as a proposal to “protect the environment through nuclear power.”
According to Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) data, the unit cost per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for nuclear-generated electricity last year was NT$1.86, compared with NT$1.57 for self-supply renewables, while for the whole of February it was NT$1.32 for nuclear-generated electricity, compared with NT$1.27 for self-supply renewables and NT$1.07 for self-supply wind-power-generated electricity.
Clearly, self-supplied electricity is cheaper than nuclear-generated electricity.
In Germany, which — following the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident in Japan — has sped up the decommissioning of aging nuclear power plants and thrown itself into the development of renewable energy sources, the average cost per kWh of solar energy has been reduced to NT$1.33.
FirstEnergy Corp in the US, unable to compete with natural gas and renewables, and with their high operation and maintenance costs, is planning to close three nuclear power plants.
Nuclear power, with its aging equipment and increasing costs, is finding it difficult to compete with “green” energy, for which costs are gradually decreasing with new technological advancements.
In late 2014, the No. 1 reactor at the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門) was shut down. In 2016, the No. 2 reactor at Guosheng was taken offline. In the middle of last year, the No. 2 reactor at Jinshan was shut down.
Whenever a reactor is taken offline, the development of renewables is given a boost. From 2014 to last year, solar energy total installed capacity rose from 437.5kW to 1,345.4kW, and the electricity generated rose from 511.7 to 1,499.4 gigawatts per hour.
Taipower and CPC Corp, Taiwan, signed a letter of intent to work together on the development of a geothermal plant in Yilan County.
Taipower chairman Yang Wei-fuu (楊偉甫) has said the company would not rule out an assessment and development of the Jinshan plant, or the mothballed Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮).
This is indirect evidence that a magma chamber could lie underneath the plants, and that if the nation is to transition to “green” energy, existing nuclear power plants first need to be repurposed.
Taiwan’s nuclear power plants, with their history of problems, are not a guarantee of steady electricity supply. The aging facilities are expensive to operate and maintain, and extending their lifespans is problematic, not only because of the significant increase in risk of disaster, but also because they would not provide inexpensive power.
Conserving energy is the only way to resolve issues of electricity demand and air pollution.
As to the idea that nuclear power can help prevent air pollution and ecological disasters, a Japanese court, ruling on the closure of a power plant in Osaka said: “The Fukushima disaster could be said to have led to the greatest environmental contamination in our [Japan’s] history, and to use this as a reason for the continued operation of this power plant is neither reasonable nor sufficiently supported by the evidence.”
Tsai Ya-ying is a lawyer affiliated with the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Election seasons expose societal divisions and contrasting visions about the future of Taiwan. They also offer opportunities for leaders to forge unity around practical ideas for strengthening Taiwan’s resilience. Beijing has in the past sought to exacerbate divisions within Taiwan. For Beijing, a divided Taiwan is less likely to pursue permanent separation. It also is more manipulatable than a united Taiwan. A divided polity has lower trust in government institutions and diminished capacity to solve societal challenges. As my co-authors Richard Bush, Bonnie Glaser, and I recently wrote in our book US-Taiwan Relations: Will China’s Challenge Lead to a Crisis?, “Beijing wants
Taiwan has never had a president who is not from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Could next year’s presidential election put a third-party candidate in office? The contenders who have thrown their hats into the ring are Vice President William Lai (賴清德) of the DPP, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). A monthly poll released by my-formosa.com on Monday showed support for Hou nosediving from 26 percent to 18.3 percent, the lowest among the three presidential hopefuls. It was a surprising
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has nominated New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) as its candidate for next year’s presidential election. The selection process was replete with controversy, mainly because the KMT has never stipulated a set of protocols for its presidential nominations. Yet, viewed from a historical perspective, the KMT has improved to some extent. There are two fundamental differences between the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP): First, the DPP believes that the Republic of China on Taiwan is a sovereign country with independent autonomy, meaning that Taiwan and China are two different entities. The KMT, on the
The US Congress in 1972 enacted Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination at schools or in education programs that receive federal funding. Since then, many barriers that blocked women from receiving an education in the US have been effectively removed. In 1970, 56.9 percent of university graduates were men and 43.1 percent were women. Twelve years later, those figures were almost the same, but in 2019, the ratios were reversed, with 57.6 percent of graduates women and 42.4 percent men. The shift is not just evident among those receiving bachelor’s degrees. The data for students obtaining associate, master’s and doctoral degrees