It all started with the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics in South Korea, where North and South Korea fielded a joint team.
The event was attended by a North Korean delegation that included North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s sister. This led to a South Korean delegation visiting Pyongyang, who were received with great fanfare by Kim and his administration.
They were conveyed a message from Kim that he was ready for a summit with US President Donald Trump to talk about denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, which Trump has accepted, but added that sanctions against Pyongyang would remain in place until an agreement is reached.
It has all been so sudden, coming after the rhetorical, but dangerous, exchange of insults between the two leaders, with Trump deriding Kim as a “little rocket man” and threatening to unleash “fire and fury.”
Kim responded by saying: “I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire.”
So what has led to this sudden change of the atmosphere? The severity of the sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council is regarded as the prime reason.
The sanctions are starting to hurt North Korea, especially after their strict enforcement to prevent any leakage that has helped Pyongyang to circumvent the blockade. Even its ally, China, has put on the squeeze just short of completely cutting off its arteries, lest a complete collapse of the regime create more problems for China, such as an exodus of refugees across its border.
Beijing has welcomed this development.
“We welcome the positive signals by the US and North Korea about having direct dialogue. The Korean Peninsula issue is moving in the right direction toward its settlement,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Geng Shuang (耿爽) said.
To suggest that the Korean Peninsula issue is moving toward its settlement is an overstatement, when even the parameters of the proposed summit are vague, to say the least.
China should know from past experience that even when it hosted talks to resolve the nuclear issue, they simply fizzled out. It is still not clear what sort of role, if any, Beijing would play to advance the process of dialogue, if it were come to that.
It must be said that Pyongyang has played its cards well so far by creating a semblance of North-South amity, starting with the Winter Olympics and using Seoul as the conduit to facilitate any dialogue with the US.
Although Seoul continues to insist, as does the US, that denuclearization of North Korea is the first order of any talks, it is difficult to envisage that Pyongyang would simply surrender.
Under Kim, North Korea has hastened to acquire the trappings of a dangerous nuclear power, even claiming that its missiles can now reach the US to inflict maximum damage. North Korea cannot be trifled with.
At the same time, if Pyongyang were serious about denuclearization, it would need to show some serious intent.
Pyongyang would believe that it has shown that intent by stopping its testing of nuclear weapons and missiles, as it did during the Winter Olympics and would likely continue during the summit and the follow-up dialogue.
This, in turn, might create a momentum to continue the process. Therefore, the first step is a moratorium on North Korea’s nuclear ambitions.
However, what might the quid pro quo be for North Korea? Pyongyang would certainly like a suspension of periodic US-South Korea military exercises that, it fears, are designed to overthrow the Kim regime. Indeed, much of its nuclear rattling is designed as a deterrent to any potential attack by the US.
North Korea would like some tangible assurance about its security and the suspension of periodic Washington-Seoul military exercises might be a step in that direction. China has favored this course as a way to break the impasse.
However, the US might not be inclined to do this because Washington’s position appears to be that denuclearization of North Korea is the first and foremost issue. Therefore, Pyongyang would not be rewarded for blackmailing the region and the world with its nuclear arsenal.
It would depend on how desperate the North Korean situation is economically, and, if it is very bad, how much of a lifeline China would be prepared to extend.
So far, China has kept North Korea on a tight leash, maintaining it just short of a collapse to avoid hordes of North Korean refugees flooding into China. China wants North Korea as a buffer between US forces in South Korea, away from its borders; but it also wants North Korea to denuclearize.
Against this backdrop, Beijing has kept up the pressure on Pyongyang and it seems to be working, with Kim keen to hold a summit with Trump. At the same time he has softened South Korea, through his Winter Olympic diplomacy, to create a seemingly unified Korean position of seeking peace, although its nuclear arsenal is a major issue.
Short of Pyongyang’s moratorium on its nuclear program and a clear follow-up commitment to denuclearization, there is unlikely to be any breakthrough. Apart from the dramatic acceptance by Trump of Kim’s offer, there is not much happening by way of preparatory diplomatic groundwork.
Sushil Seth is a commentator based in Australia.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,