The Marshal Hotel (統帥飯店), among others, partially collapsed when a magnitude 6.0 earthquake hit Hualien County on Feb. 6. It was pointed out by a number of local residents that the hotel had been structurally reinforced some time ago, with steel girders used to bolster the arcade. Regardless, these reinforcements were not sufficient to prevent the collapse of the first floor, causing the building to slant precariously.
The structural integrity of buildings tends to deteriorate over time, and alterations or additions only exacerbate this deterioration, therefore rendering the building in question all the more vulnerable to collapse. Although structural reinforcements might afford people more time to escape, they do not necessarily increase the earthquake resistance of a building.
There are more than 520,000 relatively old — aged 50 years or older — low-rise buildings across Taiwan. When these were built, there were no specific regulations governing earthquake resistance.
Consequently, the horizontal seismic force transmission of the buildings’ column-beam systems was not taken into consideration, and neither was the amount of play in the steel girders reinforcing those columns and beams. Consequently, the beam-column joints of these older buildings are not as strong as they could be.
Architectural design regulations in Taiwan state that the earthquake resistance of buildings must rely mainly on column-beam systems.
However, the reality of the situation is that when an earthquake hits, the force of it is transmitted through the entire building in a complex chain through the major and minor girders via horizontal transmission on each floor as a factor of the weight of an object on that floor, down through the main columns of the column-beam systems, and then through the columns and walls to the floor below. From there it travels to the lower floors and basement, and finally into the soil of the surrounding area, which absorbs the energy transferred from the floors above.
Most earthquake damage is caused by the cracking and fracture of columns, and the sudden collapse of the space between stories, leaving the people on individual floors little time to escape.
Structural reinforcement when these buildings were constructed was generally done by simply enlarging columns or superficially repairing walls, both of which did little to actually reinforce the structure.
Enlarging columns within the buildings by adding at least 40cm on each side of the columns was an expensive process and — together with the installation of concrete internal walls — significantly reduced the amount of interior space.
In many old buildings in Taiwan, there was already precious little space from one column to the next when they were first built, so adding extra interior walls only further reduced the space inside. On top of this, reinforcing the column-beam joints that can transmit the energy of earthquakes, apart from being technically difficult to do, is expensive, and there is no guarantee that it would be effective.
In addition, the majority of low-rises built at the time employed the isolated footing design for columns, and any alterations or improvements to this would entail major alterations that are very difficult to do.
As we have seen from the above discussion, structural reinforcements to old four or five-story buildings might be able to save people’s lives, but whether they would improve the overall structural integrity is questionable.
Such an approach might well be helpful, but it does not get to the core of the problem. To do this, the most effective and thorough way would be to construct new buildings. This would protect both lives and property.
William Hu is the chairman of the associations for the reconstruction and development of old buildings in Taipei and New Taipei City.
Translated by Eddy Chang
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats