As an amateur politician, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) won the Taipei mayoral election in 2014. Public opinion attributed a large part of the win to “big data.”
Overnight, big data took the national and local governments by storm, and it suddenly became a political hot topic. However, an examination of how governmental bodies use big data surprisingly shows that the government does not understand it.
Big data opens a wide range of possibilities. In terms of public opinion research, big data can be used to engage in social listening — monitoring social media channels or digital conversations for mention of a certain issue — through self-developed software or by commissioning professional organizations.
Institutions specializing in social listening have developed user-friendly interfaces that are as easy to use as any common software.
If governments use social listening to gain an understanding of public opinion, it should be done by a department set up for the purpose. In that way, a one-time investment would allow the whole agency or local government to gain a thorough understanding.
Disappointingly, some in government still monitor public opinion on the Internet manually and some individual agencies have commissioned different specialized organizations to handle big data for them. This is more expensive and means that results are not integrated.
It is as easy to collect online opinions as it is to conduct an opinion poll. However, casually conducted polls are never good representations of public opinion, and the same is true for big data analysis and social listening, which are even more instantaneous.
The quality of the programming, the completeness of the database and the accuracy of the semantic analysis are all essential factors when it comes to listening to public opinion on the Internet. In addition, filtering out the fake opinions overflowing the Internet is another hot topic in social listening.
Many instances of fake public opinion were uncovered last year: In a report submitted to the US Congress, Facebook said organizations had been promoting certain values by using fake personal accounts and that they were all Russia-backed; the BBC last year reported that public opinion in Brazil during the previous general election was influenced by fake social media accounts.
Some Internet users were paid to simultaneously run more than 20 fake personal accounts per person.
Taiwan is still in the early phases of detecting fake social media accounts and forged public opinion, according to Willie Li-wei Yang (楊立偉), who has been studying big data for years and is now managing director of eLand Information Co.
Yang has said that examining inconsistencies in user status and posting behavior can help filter out 60 to 70 percent of fake accounts.
When looking at current practice in social listening, it is evident that the government is still incapable of putting big data analysis to good use, let alone conducting further research and development.
There will be local elections in November, and a solid understanding and proper application of big data technologies would be helpful to candidates who want an up-do-date analysis of public opinion trends — in addition to using their own perceptiveness and political judgment, and relying on poll results.
If leaders in the government continue to be strangers to big data instead of making an effort to learn how to use it more intelligently, they will be swept away by the tides of time.
Weber Lai is a professor at the National Taiwan University of Arts’ department of radio and television and president of the Chinese Communication Management Society.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if