Parents’ associations on Wednesday criticized several junior-high and high-school sex education textbooks for including “inappropriate and misleading” information about sex and gender issues.
Their biggest points of contention were a link in one textbook to the Web site of National Central University’s Center for the Study of Sexualities, which contains information about necrophilia, zoophilia, sadomasochism and group sex. Another disputed point was a line in an eighth-grade textbook that says sexual needs should be satisfied on condition of mutual respect, consent and without hurting others.
“The sentence is inappropriate, because the legal age for sexual intercourse is 16,” said Wang Li-sheng (王立昇), head of the National Alliance of Presidents of Parents’ Associations’ think tank.
The association also criticized a section that said a woman should remain chaste until marriage and remain loyal to her husband until her death, saying these are ethical concepts that are not compatible with modern social norms.
Terms used in the text such as “homophobia” should be replaced with “phobic of homosexual people,” because homophobia is not a sickness, they said, adding that a reference to “heterosexual hegemony” should be replaced with “heterosexual mainstream,” and that masturbation should not be taught in the classroom.
US parents have also protested what they see as departures from traditional ideas in sex-education curricula. Parents in the progressive city of Fremont, California, in 2014 petitioned to replace a ninth-grade textbook that referred to sexual activity involving bondage and sensory deprivation, Alexandra Sifferlin wrote in an article for Time magazine’s Web site.
Local school board president Lara Calvert-York argued against the petition, saying that as children are already exposed to highly sexualized content on television and online, they should be taught about what they are seeing by teachers who are well-equipped to answer their questions.
A sample study that year found that, of the 1,500 students aged 10 to 17 polled, half had been exposed to pornography on the Internet. In a separate survey, 200 of the 1,000 middle-school students polled said they had received explicit text or picture messages. Nearly 80 percent of teens aged 15 to 17 had not received any formal sex education before losing their virginity, a study last year by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found.
In the US, many states have looked to parents for input in educating children about sex. Thirty-seven states and Washington allow parental involvement, five explicitly require parental consent and 35 allow parents to opt their children out of sex-ed classes altogether. At a national level, US education policy requires only that students receive formal instruction about abstinence, birth control methods and prevention of HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections.
In Taiwan, a survey by the Child Welfare League Foundation released in July last year found that many parents and teachers avoided teaching children about sex, and that while most adolescents knew about birth control, many were misinformed.
Adolescents might not be well-equipped to express their feelings, deal with abusive relationships or avoid disease and unwanted pregnancy, foundation executive director Chen Li-ju (陳麗如) said.
The survey found that 10 percent of teenagers polled were unaware that sex before the age of 16 was illegal, while 25 percent were unaware of the connection between sexual activity and sexually transmitted infections.
There is arguably no need to teach children about topics such as masochism, bestiality or group sex, but at the very least children should be taught about sex acts they are likely to experience. Penetration, both vaginal and anal, is common enough that teaching when and how it can be done safely is in everyone’s best interests.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big