When the UK became the first country in the world to undergo large-scale urbanization in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the process transformed its economy and society. Today, India is facing a similar transformation, but it is happening at 100 times the pace. By 2030, India’s urban population could reach 600 million, twice the size of the US’.
For India, rapid urbanization is particularly vital to enable the nation to take full advantage of the demographic dividend afforded by its young population. With 12 million more people joining the labor force every year, the potential of that dividend is huge.
As the urbanization process continues, connectivity, proximity and diversity will accelerate knowledge diffusion, spark further innovation, and enhance productivity and employment growth.
Illustration: Constance Chou
However, for all of its benefits, rapid urbanization also poses enormous challenges, from managing congestion and pollution to ensuring that growth is inclusive and equitable.
As a latecomer to urbanization, India will benefit from technological innovations — including digital technologies, cleaner energy, innovative construction materials and new modes of transport — that will enable it to leapfrog some of its more developed counterparts.
However, taking advantage of those technologies will require effective policies, including smart infrastructure investments and measures to make cities more competitive, particularly in modern industries.
Making its cities more competitive will require India to decide whether to emphasize specialization — with an industry concentrated in a particular city — or diversification — with each city home to a range of industries, roughly in line with the national average. This is no easy choice: The debate over which approach is better has been raging for nearly a century.
In 1991, at about the time that India’s economic liberalization began, its cities tended toward specialization. However, over the past few years, there has been a notable shift toward diversification, with some major urban centers, such as Mumbai and Bangalore, experiencing the largest and fastest shifts away from specialization.
Specialization tends to be much higher in traditional industries than in modern industries. Although some modern industries — like office accounting and computing machinery, and radio, television and communications equipment — tend to be located in more specialized districts, roughly three-quarters of Indian districts with higher specialization levels rely on traditional industries.
Of India’s 600 districts, those that remain the most specialized are Kavaratti (water transport), Darjeeling (paper products), Panchkula (office accounting and computing machinery), and Wokha (wood products).
Although India’s specialization levels were much higher than those in the US in the early 1990s, the two countries have converged over time. All of this suggests that, as technology continues to advance, so will diversification.
This bodes well for employment, because more diversified cities and districts tend to experience greater job growth. Initial clusters of modern services have also experienced abnormally high employment growth since 2000.
There is more good news: The strongest job gains due to diversification are occurring in rural areas and among small enterprises, suggesting that India’s urbanization can bring inclusive growth and prosperity. Evidence also shows that high growth rates, which support poverty reduction, are concentrated in the rural areas of particular districts.
However, taking full advantage of these positive trends will require India to boost infrastructure investment. Despite a slowdown in the manufacturing sector’s growth, urbanization has continued to accelerate in India, especially in districts with access to better infrastructure.
In the developing world, 1 billion people lack access to electricity and roads, and more than 500 million lack reliable access to safe drinking water. Addressing these deficiencies is critical to development — and India is no exception.
Access to better infrastructure will enable millions more entrepreneurs, especially women, to benefit from the nation’s urban awakening. The key to success will be to improve the efficiency of public spending while attracting more private investment.
There is certainly an economic incentive for private actors to channel their money toward developing-country infrastructure. After all, high-income countries, where populations are aging rapidly, often have an excess of savings ready to be allocated to high-yield investments. Lower-income countries, with their younger populations and large infrastructure needs, provide just such opportunities.
As it stands, however, less than 1 percent of the US$68 trillion managed by pension funds, life insurance companies and others are channeled toward infrastructure projects. And, given the low risk appetite among investors, not to mention the small size of city-level projects, municipal governments will struggle to raise that share — but it is not impossible.
What is needed is visionary leadership at the local level, with municipal governments identifying infrastructure projects that promote entrepreneurship, increase their cities’ competitiveness and promote regional development by strengthening urban-rural connectivity.
Those governments should also leverage their assets, including land; mobilize user revenue; and modify financial regulations and incentives to increase investors’ risk appetite. Add to that greater technical and financial capacity, and it would become much easier to attract the needed private funds and build partnerships benefiting India’s urban transformation.
India has all of the tools it needs to advance its urbanization process in a way that promotes inclusive and sustainable growth. It must use them wisely.
Ejaz Ghani is lead economist at the World Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big