News media have been reporting that extending the high-speed rail (HSR) to Pingtung County from its existing terminal in Kaohsiung’s Zuoying District (左營) would cost NT$50 billion (US$1.69 billion), but only cut travel time by about 10 minutes. However, there are many more aspects to consider.
To raise the discussion to the level of national and regional development, HSR construction should be assessed from a range of aspects, such as the benefits to be gained from the development of stations and the surrounding land, as well as tax increment revenue and new job opportunities.
First, when station development includes an appropriate product mix, it can effectively boost the benefits to be gained from HSR and other mass transit projects. Good examples include the joint development of the rail and metro station in Taipei’s Nangang District (南港) and the business strategy followed by Japan Railways Group. In both cases, station development is an important source of revenue.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications’ original feasibility study for a high-speed railway in Taiwan’s western corridor also included the potential benefits of station development as an important assessment factor, and this happened again when the ministry was assessing a proposal to build additional HSR stations in Miaoli, Changhua and Yunlin counties, which were built and are now in operation.
Second, extending the HSR to Pingtung would open up a transport artery that would help activate the domestic demand market. The HSR would attract large numbers of people to the area, and this transport-oriented development model would stimulate urban development, as has happened with the developmental orientations of the Taoyuan, Hsinchu and Taichung HSR stations.
The handbook on the assessment of the economic benefits of transport construction plans published by the ministry’s Institute of Transportation also lists the benefits of peripheral land development as an assessment item.
Third, HSR development can generate various kinds of tax revenue to fuel the national economy.
On Dec. 27 last year, Premier William Lai (賴清德) proposed amending the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) with the aim of adjusting the tax system and making regional development more balanced.
Pingtung is a peripheral region, so an HSR station development there would certainly generate national and local tax revenue, which would be in line with the government’s goal.
Finally, HSR construction could drive Pingtung’s development and create job opportunities. Pingtung has been suffering from a serious population exodus, but construction of an HSR would improve the county’s business and economic environment and drive the development of industrial and business parks. These developments would attract high-value industries and encourage talented people who have left the county to move home.
Early last year, the Bureau of High Speed Rail initiated a feasibility assessment for extending the HSR to Pingtung via a new route. On Dec. 26, it held an end-of-session review meeting, but it assessed the benefits of building the HSR extension only in terms of ticket revenue and time costs.
The HSR extension should be considered on other levels, such as national development strategy and the public’s well-being. Beneficial factors, such as regional economic development, tax revenue and employment opportunities, should be included when assessing the value of extending the HSR to Pingtung.
Chiu Yin-hao is acting dean of the College of City Management and head of the department of urban development at the University of Taipei.
Translated by Julian Clegg
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question: