Western reactions to events in Iran have been as fascinating to watch as the events themselves. It is true that the picture is complex, but the hesitancy on view everywhere — and the lack of publicly supportive messages to protesters — are a sign of our times. It is as if any groundswell of popular aspirations now raises suspicion.
In the aftermath of the Arab Spring, US President Donald Trump and fake news, we seem to have become disillusioned about grassroots revolts.
What might once have been hailed as a democratic revolution now appears blurry. An outpouring of anger against a corrupt regime and its diversion of resources into military adventures is met more with skepticism than hope. There are instant suggestions of a CIA-led plot or an Israeli plan.
USEFUL DIVERSION
The trouble is that authoritarian regimes stand to gain from such conspiracy theories. Speculation about external forces fostering unrest offers autocrats an immediate diversion from the question of why people are revolting.
Thirty years ago, the US political scientist Gene Sharp watched Burmese monks rise up against the military junta. He went on to write the rulebook of non-violent revolution, From Dictatorship to Democracy, which has served as a model for protesters from Serbia to Egypt.
There was a time when Western public opinion applauded such developments. No longer, it seems.
We feel burned: Look at what has become of Egypt since we cheered former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak’s overthrow in 2011.
Even Myanmar’s fight for freedom has become painful to recall, with Burmese State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi having fallen off our heroes’ list following the Rohingya massacres.
Reality is always more complicated than political theory, of course.
That Trump has tweeted in support of Iranian protesters serves as a kind of disqualification in itself, but perhaps we should also stop and think about the cynicism or numbness that seems to have gripped us.
To be sure, there is much we do not know about Iran, where independent media coverage is hard to come by, but there is also much we do know.
Last month’s announcement that the next budget would cut subsidies that were lifelines to low-income households served as a trigger.
In provincial towns, crowds gathered to vent frustration against inflation and a general sense of injustice.
‘EGG REVOLUTION’
Some dubbed this the “egg revolution,” because the price of basic foods was set to spike. Now, full-on repression has been unleashed.
Iran matters a lot. Its weight in the Middle East can hardly be overestimated. Alongside Russia, it has played a key role in crushing opposition to dictatorship in Syria. The horror of Syria’s killing fields — with an estimated 500,000 deaths — was a key reason for the massive refugee movement that has upended European politics.
Iran is a topic the US political scene can easily go berserk over — we have known that since 1979 — but Europe is on the Middle East’s doorstep. We surely have an interest in change.
Resignation and confusion are exactly what autocracies around the world want from democratic countries. It is also what their disinformation seeks to entrench. By being immune to enthusiasm when people rise up, we squander the values we claim to want to defend.
True, this might not be a repetition of the 2009 Iranian opposition Green movement, which lasted months and was largely led by educated, urban elites, but is it only when English-speaking groups take to the streets that we should show support?
Not everyone has read Gene Sharp’s book. The downtrodden do not always use codes we can easily relate to, but that makes their grievances no less real, their demands no less legitimate.
OBAMA’S OBSESSION
In 2009, unlike Trump today, then-US president Barack Obama refrained from showing any interest in the Iranian people’s power. He was obsessed with pulling off a nuclear deal with the regime — an objective that also went a long way to explaining his lack of action over Syria. Many in the Arab and Muslim world saw this as a massive let-down.
By contrast, on Feb. 11, 2011, the day Mubarak was toppled, Obama spoke of “the power of human dignity” that can “never be denied.”
“We can’t help but hear the echoes of history — echoes from Germans tearing down a wall, Indonesian students taking to the streets, Gandhi leading his people down the path of justice,” he said.
Who dares wax lyrical about Iranian democratic aspirations these days?
It took EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini a full five days after the start of the Iranian protests to say: “Human rights have always been a core issue of our relationship with Iran.”
Well, then. Of course, there are other issues at stake, such as preserving the nuclear deal Trump wants to tear up, but what about the rest of us watching? Is it enough to sit back? Can we avert our gaze when the Iranian regime helps massacre populations in Syria’s eastern Ghouta District? Has Saudi behavior in Yemen drained our capacity for indignation?
Our mental withdrawal might be precisely what spells more, not less, trouble down the line. The shrinking of our minds and the knee-jerk reactions that can come with the necessary criticism of Trump risk becoming an opt-out. Iranians deserve better.
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS