University of Oxford professor of computer science Tim Berners-Lee’s optimism about the future of the Web is starting to wane in the face of a “nasty storm” of issues, including the rollback of net neutrality protections, the proliferation of fake news, propaganda and the Web’s increasing polarization.
The inventor of the World Wide Web always maintained that his creation was a reflection of humanity — the good, the bad and the ugly — but Berners-Lee’s vision for an “open platform that allows anyone to share information, access opportunities and collaborate across geographical boundaries” has been challenged by increasingly powerful digital gatekeepers whose algorithms can be weaponized by master manipulators.
“I’m still an optimist, but an optimist standing at the top of the hill with a nasty storm blowing in my face, hanging on to a fence,” Berners-Lee said.
Illustration: Constance Chou
“We have to grit our teeth and hang on to the fence, and not take it for granted that the Web will lead us to wonderful things,” he said.
The spread of misinformation and propaganda online has exploded partly because of the way the advertising systems of large digital platforms such as Google or Facebook have been designed to hold people’s attention.
“People are being distorted by very finely trained AIs [artificial intelligence] that figure out how to distract them,” Berners-Lee said.
In some cases, these platforms offer users who create content a cut of advertising revenue. The financial incentive drove Macedonian teenagers with “no political skin in the game” to generate political clickbait — fake news that was distributed on Facebook and funded by revenue from Google’s automated advertising engine AdSense.
“The system is failing. The way ad revenue works with clickbait is not fulfilling the goal of helping humanity promote truth and democracy. So I am concerned,” said Berners-Lee, who in March called for the regulation of online political advertising to prevent it from being used in “unethical ways.”
Since then, it has been revealed that Russian operatives bought micro-targeted political ads aimed at US voters on Facebook, Google and Twitter. Data analytics firms such as Cambridge Analytica, which builds personality profiles of millions of individuals so that they can be manipulated through “behavioral micro-targeting,” have also been criticized for creating “weaponized AI propaganda.”
“We have these dark ads that target and manipulate me, and then vanish because I can’t bookmark them. This is not democracy — this is putting who gets selected into the hands of the most manipulative companies out there,” Berners-Lee said.
It is not too late to turn things around, he said, provided that people challenge the status quo.
“We are so used to these systems being manipulated that people just think that’s how the Internet works. We need to think about what it should be like,” he said.
“One of the problems with climate change is getting people to realize it was anthropogenic — created by people. It’s the same problem with social networks — they are manmade. If they are not serving humanity, they can and should be changed,” he said.
Will the situation get worse before it gets better?
“It already has got worse,” he said, referencing the rollback of rules from the administration of former US president Barack Obama to protect net neutrality.
Net neutrality, which some have described as the “first amendment of the Internet,” is the idea that Internet service providers (ISPs) should treat everyone’s data equally — whether that data consists of an e-mail from your grandmother, an episode of Stranger Things on Netflix or a bank transfer.
It ensures that the large cable ISPs, including Comcast, AT&T and Verizon, do not get to choose which data is sent more quickly and which sites get blocked or throttled depending on which content providers pay a premium.
In February 2015, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to more strictly regulate ISPs as utilities and enshrine in law the principles of net neutrality. Trump’s FCC, headed by the former Verizon associate general counsel Ajit Pai, wants to kill the rules, arguing that “nothing is broken” and that the rules were established over “hypothetical harms and hysterical prophecies of doom.”
Berners-Lee, who is in Washington urging lawmakers to reconsider the rollback, disagreed and cited problematic examples in which ISPs have violated net neutrality principles.
For example, AT&T blocked Skype and other similar services on the iPhone so it would make more money from regular phone calls and Verizon blocked Google Wallet from smartphones when it was developing a competing mobile payment service, he said.
“When I invented the Web, I didn’t have to ask Vint Cerf [the “father of the Internet”] for permission to use the Internet,” said Berners-Lee, who previously stated that the Internet should remain a “permissionless space for creativity, innovation and free expression.”
These powerful gatekeepers control access to the Internet, and pose a threat to innovation if they are allowed to pick winners and losers by throttling or blocking services, Berners-Lee said, adding that it therefore makes sense that ISPs should be treated more like utilities.
“Gas is a utility, so is clean water, and connectivity should be too,” Berners-Lee said. “It’s part of life and shouldn’t have an attitude about what you use it for — just like water.”
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of