Most Western media have characterized the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th National Congress as a stage for a power play, with President Xi Jinping (習近平) entrenching his position.
However, the accumulation of political capital in this case is a means to an end.
For Xi, that end is a smooth transition into modernity that cements the CCP’s long-term authority and ensures his own legacy as modern China’s most significant leader.
Xi knows that if China is to continue to thrive in a fast-changing world, he needs to deftly manage a major social and economic transformation, while, even more importantly, improving state governance.
To secure the long-term survival of China’s one-party system, he must reform state and party institutions: Political reform, for Xi, is a prerequisite for economic reform.
Xi’s motive in pursuing modernity is not, as many in the West have wrongly inferred, to establish China as a superpower on par with the US. On the contrary, Xi views his current challenge and mission as being primarily domestic.
He is motivated by the knowledge that success in this area would define his place in history. That, not the amount of authority he wields today, is his primary concern. Assuming otherwise sells Xi — and his political ingenuity — short.
Now firmly established as China’s most powerful leader since Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), Xi can shape his legacy according to his own vision.
Because his predecessor Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) lacked sufficient political capital to do likewise, China followed a largely passive path for a decade, pursuing conciliatory diplomacy, which enraged its citizens, and economically conservative strategies, which included suspending necessary reforms.
However, no one should mistake Xi’s enhanced powers for a personal dictatorship. His choice of members for the Politburo Standing Committee, China’s highest authority, was an accommodation to the reality that there are limits to his power. Only half of the men named to the committee are his true confidantes.
The legacy that Xi seeks comprises three key components. The first is alleviation of growing social tensions. Beyond improving the provision of public goods, his promotion of the so-called “China Dream” of national rejuvenation has been aimed, in part, at encouraging people to seek fulfillment beyond material wealth.
Second, Xi wants to strengthen the CCP not by force, but by reform. Over the past five years, Xi has led an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign, which has brought down 1 million party officials, from low-ranking bureaucrats (known as “flies”) to the highest-level officials (“tigers”), throughout the country.
Such a large-scale campaign, as some observers have portrayed it, was not a political purge in disguise. Rather, Xi knew that widespread corruption was undermining the CCP’s legitimacy in the eyes of ordinary Chinese. Only by cleaning up the party’s behavior could Xi re-establish its credibility.
Now, Xi is ready for Act II of his CCP revival: improving state governance.
Xi is well aware that a case-by-case approach would not address the root causes of widespread corruption. For that, the entire system needs an overhaul.
“The party needs to govern itself,” Xi has said.
The first step is to improve the legislative framework.
For many years, the lack of accountability, transparency and clear decisionmaking processes has impeded reform.
China needs institutionalized mechanisms for enforcing the rule of law — one aspect of Western political systems that Xi admires — among CCP officials, although the idea that the judiciary could be independent of the party remains far-fetched.
However, even the best-designed system cannot work if there is a dearth of competent personnel to run it — a limitation highlighted by Xi’s push for economic reforms in his first term as Chinese president.
That is why Xi is placing a strong emphasis on cultivating a new generation of highly educated, loyal and, most importantly, incorruptible party leaders.
A key challenge here lies in stemming the migration of China’s top talent to the private sector.
The third component of Xi’s legacy is also the most important — and already effectively secured.
At the congress, CCP delegates agreed to add “Xi Jinping Thought” to the party’s constitution, alongside “Mao Zedong (毛澤東) Thought” and “Deng Xiaoping Theory.” Now that Xi’s eponymous political ideology, which proposes an alternative to liberal democracy, is part of the school of thought around which the CCP coalesces, challenging Xi is tantamount to challenging the party’s very belief system.
Xi has made himself virtually unassailable — his rare political skill elevating him to the status of secular deity.
As a leader, Xi has a lot going for him. He is well-educated and experienced in international affairs. He has weathered serious challenges and experienced firsthand the consequences of political and economic policies gone awry.
He has a vast political network, thanks not only to his own deftness, but also to his family: He is the son of a comrade of Mao.
He now stands alongside Mao and Deng in modern China’s political pantheon.
However, Xi is not Mao, and he will not govern China as Mao did.
Instead, he will learn from Mao’s mistakes, so that he can lead China effectively into the next phase of its history — and secure the legacy that he so prizes.
Keyu Jin is a professor of economics at the London School of Economics, a World Economic Forum young global leader and a member of the Richemont Group Advisory Board.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold