Saturday was the Double Ninth Festival — the ninth day of the ninth month in the lunar calendar — which in Taiwan is designated as senior citizens’ day. As usual, plenty of activities were arranged on the day itself and during this week to show respect for elderly people and demonstrate examples of “active aging.”
The new model of a healthy old person does things like getting a college degree at age 70, cycling around Taiwan at 80, line dancing at 90 and so on. You would think that such an active and interesting lifestyle is the one that older people should have, and that if some people have achieved it, others should be able to do it, too.
However, in the real world, most elderly people are not rich and not particularly healthy.
How many people really get through old age without getting cataracts, and how many have as good a memory as they did when they were young — good enough to get a college degree? How many are spared the pain of arthritic knees so they can ride a bicycle for days on end?
Few people in Taiwan are aware that Oct. 1 is the UN International Day of Older Persons. On this day every year, the UN announces a theme, such as revealing the ever-worsening difficulties that elderly people face around the world: old-age poverty, social exclusion and so on.
It sounds like a present-day version of the Japanese film The Ballad of Narayama, which tells the story of a village where old people are carried off to the mountains and abandoned.
Along with the “double aging” that results from a falling birth rate and growing numbers of very old people, the prospect of getting old has become a frightening social risk.
In many parts of the world in the 21st century, a public strategy of “active aging” is being adopted in response to the aging population structure. Most seriously, the notion of aging but not resting is, as suggested above, intentionally being extended into life values, where it becomes a value standard for self-censorship, defining what an older person should be like.
A close look at the changes that have taken place in the systems of various nations reveals that “active aging” is mostly used to support government policies such as raising the statutory retirement age, implementing flexible retirement systems, abolishing early retirement privileges and increasing older people’s labor force participation rate.
This makes it possible to gloss over the unemployment rate, prevent a fall in the total number of social insurance contribution payers and provide some relief from the phenomenon of old-age poverty.
It might even help governments evade a collision between social welfare and the state financial system.
However, it is ultimately impossible to conceal the reality that many people cannot afford to get old. It has been said that the wages that workers earn throughout their lives in the labor market and the taxes they pay to the state are still nowhere near enough to give them a stable life in old age, and this is as true of Taiwan as it is of other nations.
Aging is an unavoidable prospect, so everyone tries to save up for old age. However, most policies and research over the years have been tied to a concept of savings that focuses on extremely individualized aspects and monetary payments, such as pensions.
Meanwhile, alternative ideas about social, ecological and cultural care are thinly implemented.
With regard to social care, the most important kind of wealth and savings for the oldest members of society is to have social and community relations of interdependence, mutual benefit and trust. This is the kind of care that money cannot buy.
One example is the “anti-fall work team” that has been developed in a grassroots community in Keelung. Community volunteers contribute their labor to cut the risk of elderly people falling, as well as avoiding the care costs that accrue after people do fall over. They visit people’s homes to help them install anti-slip equipment such as bathroom rails. In return for the labor, older people or their household members offer their own particular kinds of labor to the community, such as short-term childminding, teaching cooking skills, relating oral history and so on.
This kind of exchange forms productive intergenerational relations within the community. In this way, elderly people are no longer simply disadvantaged people who receive care in a one-way arrangement. Instead, they are valuable people who can participate in the community.
Furthermore, the labor that is exchanged can go on being circulated and extended to become a social care system.
Only through activated social relations can elderly people really achieve “active aging.”
Over the past few years, the mutual aid movements that have appeared in Taiwan’s grassroots communities bear witness to the long-standing failures of the market economy and state policies, while showing the possibility of a third path, as ordinary people, through their use of timebanks, cooperative movements and community work exchanges, draw a picture of a Taiwan where people can afford to get old.
Wang Hsing-chi is an assistant professor in Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Psychology and head of the Bottom Left Corner Workshop in Keelung.
Translated by Julian Clegg
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold