Although Beijing has been refusing to interact with the Democratic Progressive Party government, suspending official cross-strait communication mechanisms and reducing the number of Chinese tourists allowed to visit Taiwan, its “united front” tactics have continued unabated.
Following the conclusion of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th National Congress on Tuesday last week, Beijing’s united front work toward Taiwan and Hong Kong has been re-energized.
Hong Kong’s Sing Tao Daily yesterday reported that former Fujian Province CCP secretary You Quan (尤權) is likely to be named as the new director of the party’s United Front Work Department, “with emphasis on young people and the so-called elites as its main targets.”
It is no secret that China has prioritized engaging Taiwan’s grassroots voters and young people in its united front strategy. Chinese National People’s Congress Standing Committee Vice Chairman Zhang Baowen (張寶文) in July even openly mentioned that more than 200 “unification promotion” groups have been established worldwide to bolster the unification agenda and quash those calling for Taiwanese independence.
The emphasis on engaging Taiwan’s grassroots voters and young people came in the wake of the Sunflower movement in 2014, during which many of the participants expressed anxiety that their future would be increasingly dictated by China.
However, the thriving and extensive political and commercial exchanges under former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did not guarantee success in winning the hearts and minds of Taiwanese. Realizing this, Beijing has adjusted its tactics to focus on the “three middles and the youth” — residents of central and southern Taiwan, middle and low-income families, small and medium-sized enterprises, and young people — and “one generation and one stratum” — the younger generation and the grass roots.
Aside from targeting Taiwanese students with various sorts of pretenses for them to visit China in a bid to indoctrinate them, China has also recruited Taiwanese educators to participate in its united front strategy.
This was seen in the summer, when scores of school principals and teachers went on exchange trips to China. While on the surface the visits were billed as educational exchanges, the frequency of such invites no doubt paves the way for Chinese educators to visit Taiwan — a brilliant strategy that allows Chinese officials to directly interact with Taiwan’s grassroots groups under the pretense of educational exchanges.
While such exchanges are certainly welcome, as they promote mutual understanding and harmony, they are only healthy to cross-strait development when the Chinese participants harbor sincerity and goodwill toward Taiwanese. It is a different story when they have a hidden political agenda to promote unification or other political objectives aimed at undermining Taiwan’s democracy.
In short, China’s intangible united front work bears more destructive potential than its tangible military threat. As such, the government and public alike must be vigilant in the face of Beijing’s hypocrisy masquerading as harmless exchanges.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective