The issue of China using military force to bring about unification with Taiwan appears once every couple of years or so in Taiwan, a bit like asthma. Not long ago, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) brought up the issue again.
As those pushing for “unification of the motherland” no longer have a political platform, they have to hide behind criminal gangs or Chinese-funded media outlets to be able to disseminate their threats about unification through military force.
Would it really be that easy for China to attack Taiwan? Taiwan’s military strength — 17th in the world — is sufficient to defend the nation. If China wants to launch an attack, it might not necessarily gain the upper hand and could even face economic sanctions from Western countries. Would such a move be worth it or even necessary?
Those who clamor about unification through military force seem to live in the era of secret societies a century ago. They should wake up and return to reality. China will have to face some bigger issues over the next 20 years.
First, the Chinese education system’s continued hostile portrayal of Western countries does not match the realities of the young generation. China’s interactions with Western countries over the past 30 years have brought technological advancement and economic prosperity.
Anachronistically, Beijing frequently incites populist-style nationalism by citing foreign powers’ invasion of China in the 19th century. Would young people born in the past 30 years not question this?
China’s intellectuals must rethink their relationship with the world. No country has attempted to invade Chinese territory in the past three decades; instead Beijing is claiming the South China Sea as its own while repeatedly intruding on the territorial waters and airspace of neighboring countries.
China enjoys commercial, scientific and technological benefits from maintaining a peaceful relationship with the world — why would it want to destroy that?
Second, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will have to face questions from Chinese intellectuals wondering why the nation must be led by the CCP and no one else. After all, the Chiang (蔣) family lost its power in Taiwan after 50 years and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has declined.
The CCP might be able to control traditional media, block social media and mobilize pro-Beijing academics to pretend that everything is going well now, but will it be able to continue to block word of mouth or the young generation’s experiences?
Third, will the Chinese economy continue to grow? Today, the problems following China’s one-child policy have already started to show as national productivity has been reduced by half, while the burden of the elderly has doubled as a result of the policy.
As production decreases, the Chinese economy is likely to decline. If that happens, will China be able to maintain its massive military budget?
Finally, national defense strategies around the world have changed. Despite North Korea’s fragile conventional military strength, US President Donald Trump dares not act and does nothing more than scold North Korea and its leaders on Twitter.
Looking at North Korea’s situation and the intelligence of Taiwan’s military and private sector, would it really be that difficult to come up with ways of deterring an invasion by a big power and protecting Taiwan’s national sovereignty, independence and its free and democratic way of life?
Taiwan should focus on continued reform, economic growth, sovereignty and independence and increasing the public’s income and happiness. China will be busy with its own problems over the next 20 years.
Mike Chang is an accountant.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS