Pension cuts did not do it
The Budget Center of the Legislative Yuan has recently been quoted in the media as saying that “the civil servant turnover rate has continued to increase over the last five years, from 0.72 percent in 2010 to 0.86 percent in 2016.”
Although the trend is clearly there, there are about 350,000 civil servants in the nation, so an increase of only 0.14 percentage points over five years translates into just more than 400 individuals, across all levels of government — or perhaps one person leaving from each section over a five-year period. Therefore, it is a bit of an exaggeration to say that civil servants are leaving in droves because cuts to retirement benefits are making working in the civil service less attractive.
The contention, as some academics have suggested, that this trend might well be detrimental to the objective of improving the caliber of our civil servants, is even more tenuous. If it is indeed the case that, in our sprawling civil service system, the loss of not even 1 percent of personnel is to have an effect on the caliber of service, then it is difficult to maintain confidence in the training quality.
To put it another way, if the employee turnover rate in companies worldwide was actually under 1 percent per annum, it would be said that the companies were doing something right.
To look at it more negatively, it might be said that the nation’s bureaucracy is hardly dynamic, but it is just as concerning that civil servants, hidden away in the safe confines of the state mechanism, are out of touch with ordinary people.
If these civil servants are willing to venture out from that safety into the private sector, this suggests that the conditions of the private sector and the remuneration it offers are as good or better than those offered in the public sector — and that there are even more opportunities there.
From the perspective of both the government and the private sector, this can only be a good thing. The only thing worth being concerned about here is whether there is bad money chasing out the good.
Chen Wen-ching
Hsinchu City
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS