The campaign to change the nation’s time zone to that of Japan and South Korea is simply a new chapter in the pettiness and shortsightedness of certain elements of society.
China should be seen as the petty one, as it blocks Taiwan’s attempts to assert itself internationally and launches hostile rhetoric to undermine its sovereignty.
Suggesting something as pointless as changing time zones just to disassociate Taiwan from China not only has zero benefits, but brings the nation to China’s level.
At least China’s moves, while seemingly childish at times, actually affect Taiwan and how it is treated internationally.
This unlikely time zone debacle will have no effect on Beijing and will likely be laughed off by Chinese officials.
If anything, it will drive the wedge between Taiwan’s opposing political factions deeper at a time when the pan-blue and pan-green camps are already prone to petty squabbles over ideology instead of seriously looking at what is best for the nation.
Not only would the move be purely symbolic and have no direct benefits, but it is already wasting public resources, because the National Development Council, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications and the Ministry of the Interior will have to hold a meeting — tentatively set for tomorrow — to discuss who should be responsible for the issue, since the petition received enough signatures online.
If people have so much time, why do they not think of concrete ways to improve Taiwan to make it better able to compete against their unfriendly neighbor?
China can afford to be petty because it already has strength and wealth. Taiwanese need to stop squabbling and ramp up their game.
Many similar controversial issues do make sense on some level. Banning the Chinese flag or reducing the amount of Chinese history in textbooks are one thing, as they reinforce Taiwanese identity and pride — something the nation desperately needs. Time zones, on the other hand, are not unique to China and is going too far out on a limb.
Being in the same time zone does not indicate that two nations have a “superior-subordinate relationship.”
What about the other countries in the time zone, such as the Philippines and Australia? The logic is flawed, and no matter how much someone supports Taiwanese independence, this notion is simply nonsense.
The petition also argued that Taiwan once shared the same time zone with Japan — but that is because Taiwan was part of the Japanese Empire under colonial rule. Being ruled by any foreign power as second-class citizens should never be something to reminisce upon — including the Martial Law era. To make this argument is an insult to the very independence these petitioners are trying to promote.
China is a threat, but at least it has yet to take over Taiwan, set up headquarters in Taipei and start telling people what to do as the Japanese did. Another deeply flawed argument.
Furthermore, the logistics of the proposal — such as flight schedules and so on — would be a nightmare.
Stop wasting time on such petty ideas and think about how to make Taiwan a stronger and better nation. Otherwise, it might lose its treasured de facto independence before we even realize it.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Alarm bells over a “hollowing out” of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry and US demands for “protection money” have fueled a panic over Taiwan. To understand how misplaced these fears are, consider the movements of global technology giants. Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳), Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) CEO Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) could undoubtedly understand the situation best, and they continue to make key investments in Taiwan. They do not make decisions on a whim. They are the architects of global computing power strategy and possess the highest levels of industry knowledge. No