Rodney Syme has been lobbying for voluntary assisted dying for more than three decades. Yesterday afternoon Victoria’s state parliament was to launch a debate on legislation that is the closest advocates, such as Syme, have come to seeing patients being granted the legal right to medically end their life.
“On the first day of the debate I’m going to play golf,” said Syme, a urologist. “Then I’ll come home and find out what has happened. You can’t get yourself too wound up in this, because whatever happens I’ll know that I’ve done my darndest for 30 years to advocate for change.”
However, the 82 year-old, the vice president of Dying With Dignity Victoria, said that if the legislation passes, he will be “pleased to see it over with.”
“It will help a very small group of people who need help and will allow people to have an open, honest talk about death to their doctor,” he said. “It will encourage dialogue about end-of-life care and improve the quality of palliative care, as has happened in other countries with assisted dying legislation.”
This is not a private member’s bill, as in attempts to pass similar legislation in other parts of Australia, but a law with government backing and the personal support of Victoria State Premier Daniel Andrews. Politicians are to be given a conscience vote.
It is the lower house where the debate is likely to be most rigorous and where supporters have had to work the hardest to persuade politicians.
Dying With Dignity has been encouraging its members to contact their local MPs in recent weeks to get those who remain undecided over the line.
The group is more confident of upper house support, but Syme thinks the legislation will pass both chambers.
“In recent weeks, I think more and more MPs from around Victoria are coming out in support of the legislation, particularly younger MPs,” he said. “Now you never know what politicians will do with a conscience vote. Is it their own values and beliefs they will express, or the values and beliefs of their constituents, or the values of their leader? But I think if you look at the debate over the past couple of weeks there has been a momentum for change and I am just quietly confident that it will pass.”
In July, the assisted dying advocacy group Go Gentle Australia surveyed 500 Victorians and found that public approval for voluntary euthanasia laws was stronger than support for same-sex marriage or abortion rights. And 55 percent of those who identified as Coalition votes supported change.
Syme said momentum had grown to the point where he did not believe politicians could be justified in voting against change.
Syme became involved in the issue in 1972 when he treated a woman with incurable cancer of the spine.
Her nerve and bone pain was persistent and unbearable, and at the time there was no effective way to relieve her pain, he said.
Intolerable suffering began to weigh on his mind.
However, he did not come out publicly in support of voluntary assisted dying until 1987, when he wrote a letter to the Age in support of a medical colleague who believed laws were needed.
A journalist subsequently rang him to press him further.
“I was very naive with journalists back then and I waffled away, and just in the course of conversation indicated I’d helped a number of people at the end of their life with medication. The next thing I knew the front page of the Age on a Saturday morning was plastered with the headline: ‘Doctor helps people to die.’ I’d specifically given people medication they could use to end their life. So I was in the deep end then, and that was really when this all started,” he said.
Two important things have changed in the debate since then, Syme said.
First, a lot of empirical evidence has emerged from countries to have passed the laws which has helped to inform Victoria’s bill.
Second, he pointed to the “beating” the hierarchy of Catholic Church has taken for their “dogmatic positions,” which have “got nothing to do with Jesus Christ.”
Nonetheless, Catholic priests were asked by the church hierarchy to read out a message during weekend services declaring the proposed legislation “unsafe.”
Syme wanted to make it clear that he is a supporter and advocate for pain relief and quality palliative care.
He urged those concerned that passing voluntary assisted dying laws would result in watered-down laws to look at the evidence from other countries, such as the state of Oregon in the US, which has had legislation in place for 20 years.
Victoria’s legislation, though unique, is more closely modelled on Oregon than laws in Europe.
However, there were some cases where pain and suffering simply could not be relieved, Syme said.
“The studies showed that the availability of palliative care was very high in Oregon and that the use of opioids for pain relief was very high in Oregon, and it also showed of those provided with drugs to end their life, 30 percent did not use them, a very significant figure,” he said.
“Just 0.4 percent of people end their lives with voluntary euthanasia in Oregon. It’s not going to be a lot of people who use the Victorian laws if they pass, but we are talking about people for whom suffering is such that palliative care can’t help them, unless they are put into a coma and given a combination of drugs like sedatives and morphine, which has the effect of hastening their death anyway,” Syme added.
“So in a sense, assisted dying happens now and it’s just not regulated or monitored, and we don’t know if patients have given consent. If legislation is passed in Victoria, we would have a situation that would be open, transparent and reported,” he said. “That seems much safer.”
St Vincent’s private hospital in Melbourne, one of Australia’s largest private Catholic hospitals, has said it would not carry out requests for voluntary assisted dying should the laws pass.
Under the laws, doctors have a right to refuse to be involved.
While high-ranking Catholics have been active in lobbying Victorian politicians, Syme said they have been largely “distracted by the marriage equality debate.”
He said lobbying was not at the level seen during previous attempts to introduce legislation around Australia.
“Our opponents argue from the basis of fear and uncertainty, and the basis of their argument is not factual information, and when it is factual it’s what you might call one-off exceptional circumstances,” he said.
“The Catholic Church has been beaten around in a number of areas. Contraception. Abortion. Stem cell research. Child abuse. And now this. People are leaving the church in droves and if you look at expert polling it shows that between 60 percent and 70 percent of Catholics support legislative change. They can’t see why people have to suffer,” Syme said.
“The difference is between the hierarchy of the church and the ordinary Catholic. I don’t think that hierarchy is being influential on Catholics any more,” he said.
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
RSS