Some readers might find this article too idealistic, but it is time to infuse some idealism into Taiwanese society.
People might change their names to please others in exchange for benefit and profit, but this is not a decent thing to do. However, this is precisely what our government has been doing in response to pressure from China.
The Republic of China (ROC) was not allowed to join the WTO, so it changed its name to the “Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu” to become a WTO member.
Nor is the ROC allowed to participate in international sports events, so it changed its name to “Chinese Taipei” to make participation possible.
There are several reasons for the nation doing so: to obtain some benefit, to improve Taiwan’s “visibility” and to avoid being “isolated” in the international community.
However, these arguments can be refuted by anyone who advocates using “Taiwan” as the nation’s name.
First, when it comes to international organizations that do not accept the name “Taiwan,” Taiwanese should boycott them and not participate in them for the sake of the nation’s dignity. Some benefits should be sacrificed.
Second, so-called “visibility” is not worth pursuing at the cost of the nation’s dignity.
Taiwanese should model themselves after Nordic countries — they do not host that many big international sports events, fairs and so on, yet they are highly visible in the world, because they have sound democracies, freedom and human rights, comprehensive welfare systems, narrow wealth gaps and international humanitarian policies.
When France was defeated in the Franco-Prussian War, the peace treaty was extremely harsh to France — in addition to having to cede territory to Prussia, it also had to pay a war indemnity of 5 billion francs, an astronomical figure.
It was widely expected that France would be crushed by this huge debt and never be able to regain its feet.
However, to the world’s astonishment, the French took it as such a humiliation and blow to their reputation that they worked hard to increase production and made generous monetary contributions to quickly pay off the indemnity.
This tells us that a nation’s wounded pride can spark miraculous results, which once again highlights the importance of a nation’s dignity. Perhaps this is something that Taiwanese can learn from.
Third, if international organizations do not accept the nation’s participation under the name “Taiwan,” then Taiwanese should boycott them and reject participation. If this results in the nation’s isolation, it would be a matter of “honorable isolation,” and Taiwanese should accept it fearlessly so that their descendants can proudly cherish a legacy of forebears who bravely and heroically accepted international isolation at a heavy cost to maintain their dignity.
Perhaps doing so could become another milestone in the history of the world.
The only choice that Taiwanese have is to walk down one of these two paths: to reject the nation’s name and swallow the humiliation of being manipulated by others — for the sake of maintaining a few benefits — or to bravely accept an “honorable isolation” and to pay the painful price for it — for the sake of maintaining the nation’s dignity.
Those who advocate changing the nation’s name to “Taiwan” should help other Taiwanese understand that the dignity of the citizenry is more important than anything else — once Taiwanese lose their dignity, the nation will decline.
Peng Ming-min was a senior adviser to former president Chen Shui-bian.
Translated by Lin Lee-Kai
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct