Political compromise is difficult in Cambodia’s emerging democracy, even though no one doubts it is necessary for political stability and economic development for many reasons, including the recent increase in political polarization, and the ruling party’s repression of its opponents and critics.
However, there is no incentive for political compromise due to the political culture of revenge and China’s backing of the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) against the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP).
The deep-seated fear of political revenge is encapsulated in an oft-quoted Khmer saying: “When the water rises, the fish eats the ant, but when the water recedes, the ant eats the fish.”
CPP elites’ fear of political revenge constitutes their uncompromising mindset, characterized by their win-at-all-cost strategies and dark chapters of Cambodia’s political history that teach leaders to distrust their opponents. This mindset is conducive to campaigning, but not to governing, because losing power is not an option in zero-sum politics.
Chinese leaders deny that Beijing has anything to do with the CPP’s crackdown on its opponents because it does not interfere in Cambodia’s domestic politics, but anyone can draw a direct line connecting China’s all-out support for the CPP with the recent uptick of political repression in Cambodia.
China’s “rolling back of Western influence in Cambodia” has hardened the CPP’s uncompromising stand and significantly minimized both the economic and political cost of repression against its opponents.
It is foreseeable that the ruling party’s increased repression would justify more devious and vicious resistance by the opposition, feeding mutual fear of harsher revenge. The culture of dialogue and political moderation has largely retreated to the primacy of political extremism in Cambodia.
If the ruling elites view the Chinese one-party state model as the best cure for political ills in Cambodia, then they are certainly remiss of what the future will bring. Political instability will only worsen as cyberspace, a place where no one is really in charge, has increasingly become the prime domain for political contestation.
Since the 2013 election, online social media have replaced mainstream media as the primary vehicle for political campaigning. In the very near future, cyberspace will enable an individual or an entity to improvise more penetrating and cheaper means of influencing politics across national boundaries.
As more young Cambodians spend more of their lives in cyberspace, an already divided and weak Cambodia will be more vulnerable to destabilizing forces inside and outside the nation.
Fast-forward to the future, the greatest danger to Cambodia’s national interest will be the culture of political revenge because the national disunity it creates will drag Cambodia into more violence, deeper poverty and greater despair.
When it is all over, the nation will be far behind its neighbors, including Vietnam and Myanmar, in terms of economic development.
However, there is an alternative, but it is an uphill road to a brighter future for all Cambodians — that is, a harmonious society, a win-win political culture and a resilient economy that would enable the nation to compete and thrive in a fast-changing world.
Unfortunately, fear is gravity in Cambodian politics, always driving politicians to take the easier path to total victory over their opponents, whom they suspect are out to get them.
Kosal Path is assistant professor of political science at the City University of New York’s Brooklyn College.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Taiwan’s economic momentum, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) products, remains strong, with booming demand for advanced semiconductors, servers and key components. In the first quarter, GDP expanded 14.55 percent year-on-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth and accelerating from the 12.95 percent expansion in the previous quarter, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported on Friday. Net exports remained the dominant driver of growth, contributing 10.33 percentage points to Taiwan’s GDP growth in the first quarter. That came as exports rose 35.76 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, outpacing 26.34 percent growth in imports, the