ASEAN on Sunday issued a joint communique for its ministerial meeting in Manila. Among other things, the communique called for “non-militarization and self-restraint” in the South China Sea.
This touched upon a subject Beijing would prefer to keep in the background.
However, China would have generally considered the meeting a success. In a statement after the communique was issued, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the ASEAN agreed to work toward a South China Sea Code of Conduct framework with Beijing.
The communique, carefully worded to avoid offending Beijing, will hopefully ease tensions in the area. However, the proposed code will not be legally binding, although certain ASEAN ministers would like it to be.
If China was happy with its meetings, it was frustrated by a statement on Monday by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Australian Minister of Foreign Affairs Julie Bishop and Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Taro Kono, who, after a meeting on their own on the sidelines of the ASEAN gathering in Manilia, directly addressed the South China Sea issue and China’s “nine-dash line.”
ASEAN promotes economic, political, military, educational and cultural cooperation between member states. China fits in with this group by virtue of the ASEAN–China Free Trade Area that came into effect on Jan. 1, 2010.
However, China has territorial and exclusive economic zone disputes with most ASEAN nations. Its dispute with half of them — the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia — stems from its insistence on the “nine-dash line,” which extends into the South China Sea. Beijing contends that this line gives China historical rights over the vast area it outlines.
China’s historical claim was last year rejected by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague, the Netherlands, which found for Manila, saying that there was no evidence backing the claim. Beijing refused to accept the court’s findings and the legitimacy of Manila’s case.
This came as no surprise, as it is not in China’s national interest. Beijing will continue to build military installations on the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) because these form part of its regional military strategy and it will not be signing any agreements that question or curtail its right to do so.
Just as China’s claims of sovereignty over Taiwan are based upon a dubious historical basis that fits in with Beijing’s delusional reading of history, its historically dubious claims to vast swathes of the South China Sea seriously jeopardizes regional peace and prosperity.
The joint statement by the US, Australian and Japanese ministers brought the South China Sea dispute back into focus. It demanded that China and the Philippines abide by the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling. It also urged that the yet-to-be-drafted ASEAN-China code of conduct be legally binding and “consistent with international law.”
It is only right that these foreign ministers stood up to China and encouraged Beijing to face historical reality, its responsibilities as part of the international community and the need for compliance with international law, even if such demands did not fit with Beijing’s agenda.
It is equally right that members of the international community stand up to China on Taiwan’s behalf. Beijing needs to face up to the historical reality of its “claims” on Taiwan, start complying with international law about what constitutes a sovereign nation and begin acting like a responsible member of the international community.
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic