Believers in the quest to “make America great again” should consider where there is evidence things are going down the tubes. There is hardly a more dismal example than the national decline in sperm production.
Last week, scientists published a study confirming that sperm counts are half what they were in the early 1970s — and not just in the US, but also in Europe, Australia and New Zealand. The more alarmist accounts warned that the human race is teetering on the brink of extinction.
The good news is that our extinction is probably about as imminent as that of cockroaches. The bad news is that something disturbing is going on.
Illustration: Mountain People
Some scientists worry that the ubiquitous hormone-disrupting chemicals used in plastics, cosmetics and food processing could affect human reproductive health. In doses comparable to typical human exposures, some of these so-called endocrine disruptors cause a host of problems in lab rats, including lowered sperm counts.
The good news first: Human fertility is not declining and the human population is still growing fast, despite those dwindling sperm numbers.
That is because humans make a superabundance of sperm — about 200 million per ejaculation — which is 199,999,999 more than the minimum you need to make a baby.
Of course, the female reproductive tract is hard to navigate, so it is advantageous to launch a large fleet, but biologists say we owe our downright extravagance to something they call sperm competition.
Scientists have documented this phenomenon in a number of species, including insects and mice. There is still some disagreement about how much it affects humanity, but those who make a case for human sperm competition see evidence in the ways our physiology compares with that of our closest primate relatives.
In chimpanzees, for example, females will mate in a seemingly indiscriminate fashion when they enter a two to three-day fertile period each month, University of Albany evolutionary psychologist Gordon Gallup said.
That is how sperm from different males wind up in the same place at the same time, thus setting up a competitive tournament in the female fallopian tubes.
Male chimps compete with a numbers game, ejaculating an average of 600 million sperm, which they produce in “pendulous” testicles three times the size of human ones, Gallup said.
In gorillas, by contrast, females primarily mate only with the alpha male, whose sperm therefore do not have to face much competition, so gorillas have predictably very small testicles and much lower sperm counts.
Humans find themselves in the middle. Monogamy is common among humans, but so is cheating.
Todd Shackelford, an evolutionary psychologist at Oakland University in Michigan, said there have been a number of studies of human paternity showing between 1.9 percent and 5 percent of children are not the offspring of the purported father, so it appears that men have also evolved for sperm competition.
“It’s like playing the lottery,” he said. “The more tickets you buy, the greater your chances of winning.”
Evolution probably has not made human sperm counts plummet in just a few decades — especially since cheating has not gone out of fashion. That suggests an environmental cause is more likely.
Some have put the blame on stress, sedentary work habits, even the popularity of “tighty whities,” while others have focused on a class of substances called phthalates, which are in used in flexible plastics, perfumes, hairspray and nail polish.
The leader of the most recent sperm study, Shanna Swan of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Beth Israel, said while they cannot prove that phthalates are contributing to sperm decline, both human and animal studies offer reason for concern.
Exposing lab animals to phthalates causes an increase in a birth defect called hypospadias — incomplete development of the male genitalia, leading the urethra to exit on the underside of the penis. In humans there is some concern that the rate of hypospadias is rising, although it is up for debate.
Another sign of disrupted male development is a shortening of what the scientists call the anogenital distance (ADG), which is, as it sounds, the distance between the anus and the genitals. Normally in both humans and lab rodents, this distance is twice as long in males as females.
In lab mice exposed to phthalates, the male ADG is shortened, and studies in humans are showing a connection between phthalate concentrations in pregnant women’s urine and a shorter AGD in their sons.
Swan said other studies show that men with a short ADG, hypospadias or undescended testicles are more likely to have low sperm count, infertility and cardiovascular disease. These problems are all connected.
Why are males affected? It comes down to the quirks of of mammalian sexual development.
Male and female embryos look alike from the start, with little nubs of tissue capable of becoming the genitals of either sex. For humans, the sexes differentiate in a window between the eighth and 15th week of the mother’s pregnancy, when male hormones should start sculpting the male organs.
Females require some hormones for their development; however, their pathway is not so easily disrupted.
So if US President Donald Trump decides he wants to make US ejaculation great again, he might start by increasing efforts by the US Environmental Protection Agency to identify the most hazardous endocrine disruptors and issue warning labels.
There are tens of thousands of unregulated chemicals out there, but only a subset of them show the potential to interrupt male development.
Trump, as the first presidential candidate to use the size of his genitals as a debating point, should understand why the issue matters.
Faye Flam is a Bloomberg View columnist. She was a staff writer for Science magazine and a columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS