A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is already well underway and is more severe than previously feared, according to new research.
Scientists analyzed both common and rare species, and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis, and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilization, although there remains a short window of time in which to act.
The new study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilization.”
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico professor Gerardo Ceballos, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”
Previous studies have shown species are going extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.
The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50 percent of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades.
Detailed data is available for land mammals and almost half of these have lost 80 percent of their range in the past century.
The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.
“The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe,” the scientists concluded.
They said, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good.
“All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life,” the report said.
Wildlife is dying out due to habitat destruction, overhunting, toxic pollution, invasion by alien species and climate change, but the ultimate cause of all of these factors is “human overpopulation and continued population growth, and overconsumption, especially by the rich”, said the scientists, who include Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich, whose 1968 book The Population Bomb is a seminal, if controversial, work.
“The serious warning in our paper needs to be heeded because civilization depends utterly on the plants, animals and microorganisms of Earth that supply it with essential ecosystem services, ranging from crop pollination and protection to supplying food from the sea and maintaining a livable climate,” Ehrlich told the Guardian.
Other ecosystem services include clean air and water.
“The time to act is very short,” Ehrlich said. “It will, sadly, take a long time to humanely begin the population shrinkage required if civilization is to long survive, but much could be done on the consumption front and with ‘band aids’ — wildlife reserves, diversity protection laws — in the meantime.”
Ceballos said an international institution is needed to fund global wildlife conservation.
The new research analyzed data on 27,500 species of land vertebrates from the International Union for Conservation of Nature and found the ranges of a third have shrunk in recent decades. Many of these are common species and Ceballos gave an example from close to home.
“We used to have swallows nesting every year in my home near Mexico City — but for the last 10 years there are none,” he said.
The researchers also point to the “emblematic” case of the lion.
“The lion was historically distributed over most of Africa, southern Europe and the Middle East, all the way to northwestern India. [Now] the vast majority of lion populations are gone,” they said.
Duke University professor Stuart Pimm, who was not involved in the new work, said the overall conclusion is correct, but he disagrees that a sixth mass extinction is already under way.
“It is something that hasn’t happened yet — we are on the edge of it,” Pimm said.
Pimm also said there were important caveats that result from the broad-brush approach used.
“Should we be concerned about the loss of species across large areas — absolutely — but this is a fairly crude way of showing that,” he said. “There are parts of the world where there are massive losses, but equally there are parts of the world where there is remarkable progress. It is pretty harsh on countries like South Africa, which is doing a good job of protecting lions.”
Robin Freeman of the Zoological Society of London said: “While looking at things on aggregate is interesting, the real interesting nitty gritty comes in the details. What are the drivers that cause the declines in particular areas?”
Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3,000 species that indicated that 50 percent of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work, but was based on different data. He agreed strong language is needed.
“We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw,” he said.
Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.
Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb, but said it had been successful in its central aim — alerting people to global environmental issues and the role of the human population in them.
His message remains blunt today.
“Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot,” he said.
EARTH’S FIVE PREVIOUS MASS EXTINCTIONS
End-Ordovician, 443 million years ago
A severe ice age led to sea levels falling by 100m, wiping out 60 to 70 percent of all species which were prominently ocean dwellers at the time. Then soon after the ice melted leaving the oceans starved of oxygen.
Late Devonian, 360 million years ago
A messy prolonged climate change event, again hitting life in shallow seas very hard, killing 70 percent of species, including almost all corals.
Permian-Triassic, 250 million years ago
The big one — more than 95 percent of species perished, including trilobites and giant insects — strongly linked to massive volcanic eruptions in Siberia that caused a savage episode of global warming.
Triassic-Jurassic, 200 million years ago
Three-quarters of species were lost, again most likely due to another huge outburst of volcanism. It left the Earth clear for dinosaurs to flourish.
Cretaceous-Tertiary, 65 million years ago
An giant asteroid impact in Mexico, just after large volcanic eruptions in India, saw the end of the dinosaurs and ammonites. Mammals, and eventually humans, took advantage.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS