A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is already well underway and is more severe than previously feared, according to new research.
Scientists analyzed both common and rare species, and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis, and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilization, although there remains a short window of time in which to act.
The new study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilization.”
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico professor Gerardo Ceballos, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”
Previous studies have shown species are going extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.
The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50 percent of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades.
Detailed data is available for land mammals and almost half of these have lost 80 percent of their range in the past century.
The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.
“The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe,” the scientists concluded.
They said, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good.
“All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life,” the report said.
Wildlife is dying out due to habitat destruction, overhunting, toxic pollution, invasion by alien species and climate change, but the ultimate cause of all of these factors is “human overpopulation and continued population growth, and overconsumption, especially by the rich”, said the scientists, who include Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich, whose 1968 book The Population Bomb is a seminal, if controversial, work.
“The serious warning in our paper needs to be heeded because civilization depends utterly on the plants, animals and microorganisms of Earth that supply it with essential ecosystem services, ranging from crop pollination and protection to supplying food from the sea and maintaining a livable climate,” Ehrlich told the Guardian.
Other ecosystem services include clean air and water.
“The time to act is very short,” Ehrlich said. “It will, sadly, take a long time to humanely begin the population shrinkage required if civilization is to long survive, but much could be done on the consumption front and with ‘band aids’ — wildlife reserves, diversity protection laws — in the meantime.”
Ceballos said an international institution is needed to fund global wildlife conservation.
The new research analyzed data on 27,500 species of land vertebrates from the International Union for Conservation of Nature and found the ranges of a third have shrunk in recent decades. Many of these are common species and Ceballos gave an example from close to home.
“We used to have swallows nesting every year in my home near Mexico City — but for the last 10 years there are none,” he said.
The researchers also point to the “emblematic” case of the lion.
“The lion was historically distributed over most of Africa, southern Europe and the Middle East, all the way to northwestern India. [Now] the vast majority of lion populations are gone,” they said.
Duke University professor Stuart Pimm, who was not involved in the new work, said the overall conclusion is correct, but he disagrees that a sixth mass extinction is already under way.
“It is something that hasn’t happened yet — we are on the edge of it,” Pimm said.
Pimm also said there were important caveats that result from the broad-brush approach used.
“Should we be concerned about the loss of species across large areas — absolutely — but this is a fairly crude way of showing that,” he said. “There are parts of the world where there are massive losses, but equally there are parts of the world where there is remarkable progress. It is pretty harsh on countries like South Africa, which is doing a good job of protecting lions.”
Robin Freeman of the Zoological Society of London said: “While looking at things on aggregate is interesting, the real interesting nitty gritty comes in the details. What are the drivers that cause the declines in particular areas?”
Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3,000 species that indicated that 50 percent of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work, but was based on different data. He agreed strong language is needed.
“We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw,” he said.
Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.
Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb, but said it had been successful in its central aim — alerting people to global environmental issues and the role of the human population in them.
His message remains blunt today.
“Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot,” he said.
EARTH’S FIVE PREVIOUS MASS EXTINCTIONS
End-Ordovician, 443 million years ago
A severe ice age led to sea levels falling by 100m, wiping out 60 to 70 percent of all species which were prominently ocean dwellers at the time. Then soon after the ice melted leaving the oceans starved of oxygen.
Late Devonian, 360 million years ago
A messy prolonged climate change event, again hitting life in shallow seas very hard, killing 70 percent of species, including almost all corals.
Permian-Triassic, 250 million years ago
The big one — more than 95 percent of species perished, including trilobites and giant insects — strongly linked to massive volcanic eruptions in Siberia that caused a savage episode of global warming.
Triassic-Jurassic, 200 million years ago
Three-quarters of species were lost, again most likely due to another huge outburst of volcanism. It left the Earth clear for dinosaurs to flourish.
Cretaceous-Tertiary, 65 million years ago
An giant asteroid impact in Mexico, just after large volcanic eruptions in India, saw the end of the dinosaurs and ammonites. Mammals, and eventually humans, took advantage.
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
Taiwan ranks second globally in terms of share of population with a higher-education degree, with about 60 percent of Taiwanese holding a post-secondary or graduate degree, a survey by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development showed. The findings are consistent with Ministry of the Interior data, which showed that as of the end of last year, 10.602 million Taiwanese had completed post-secondary education or higher. Among them, the number of women with graduate degrees was 786,000, an increase of 48.1 percent over the past decade and a faster rate of growth than among men. A highly educated population brings clear advantages.
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS