Beijing on July 4 announced that it would relax rules on Taiwanese studying in China. Any Taiwanese high-school graduate with a passing grade [in Taiwan’s joint college entrance exams] can now apply to study at Chinese universities.
This exacerbates a problem stemming from the nation’s relatively low birthrate. It is likely to seriously affect medium and low-ranked Taiwanese universities in particular, as it would be much harder for them to recruit and retain students.
Although the relaxation of the regulations means more options for students, they might need to evaluate the situation comprehensively, because the policy involves several factors:
First, most students would like to enter top Chinese universities such as Peking University or Tsinghua University, but the chance for students with a mere passing grade is slim.
If they lower their expectations, they might be able to enter a second-class university, but unless they want to start their career in China after graduating, studying at a Taiwanese university would be a better choice.
PASSING GRADE
Second, the policy involves the Ministry of Education’s recognition of foreign academic credentials for higher-education institutions.
The ministry only recognizes 155 top Chinese universities, mostly under Beijing’s Project 985 and Project 211. It might be difficult for students with a passing grade to enter those institutions.
However, if they study at universities that are not recognized by the ministry, it might not be easy for them to work in Taiwan after graduating.
Third, students’ adaptability and attitude will be important.
China is still a country that places restrictions on politics and freedom of speech. Taiwanese are used to freedom and many have a high dependence on the Internet; “Facebook addicts” might die of thirst in China.
Indeed, the change in the rules might prompt medium and low-ranked Taiwanese universities to improve their competitiveness and attractiveness to keep students.
Some universities promote themselves through better scholarships, while others emphasize other advantages.
FREE AND LOOSE
However, in the face of a free and loose academic atmosphere, universities should buck the trend and make strict demands on students to clear the bad reputation of poor student performance and narrow the gap between theory and practice.
Otherwise, if the problems continue, Taiwanese universities will face collapse once local enterprises turn to students who graduated in China.
Generally, China does not have many restrictions on Taiwanese students studying there, but it does have many restrictions on Chinese students studying here.
Similarly, Taiwan is also imposing various restrictions on Chinese students studying here, such as the ministry’s “three limits, six noes” policy on Chinese students — banning them from receiving scholarships, taking off-campus jobs and taking tests for national professional certificates.
However, if the situation continues, cross-strait student exchanges might become imbalanced. The ministry should prevent this.
To have more Chinese students studying in Taiwan, it is necessary to negotiate with the Chinese side, but cross-strait talks have not been available.
From the higher-education exchanges between the two sides, Taiwan’s policy is likely to face more obstacles and the balance in cross-strait student exchanges is likely to tilt.
Chang Ruay-shiung is the president of National Taipei University of Business.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS