China’s treatment of cancer-stricken democracy activist Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) reflects Beijing’s hardening crackdown on political dissent and heightens concern over lesser-known campaigners still languishing in jail, supporters said.
Liu, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2010 while serving an 11-year sentence for subversion, has been transferred from a prison to a hospital on medical parole for terminal liver cancer treatment, his lawyer said on Monday.
The 61-year-old is one of China’s best-known activists, having spent decades campaigning for greater democracy and human rights in the country, and his jailing in 2009 drew global calls for his release.
Prison authorities said Liu was under the care of “eight renowned Chinese oncologists” at a hospital in Shenyang, the capital of northeastern Liaoning Province.
Activists said the move was not a humanitarian gesture, but rather a cynical attempt by authorities to avoid a backlash for allowing such a high-profile human rights defender to die behind bars.
“Presumably they didn’t want him to die in the prison — they want him to die somewhere else,” said Human Rights Watch China director Sophie Richardson, who described Liu’s treatment as a “travesty.”
Blind human rights lawyer Chen Guangcheng (陳光誠), who fled to the US in 2012, said: “If Liu died in prison, this would arouse the anger of the people and accelerate the demise of the CCP [Chinese Communist Party].”
Liu’s treatment offered little hope to lower-profile activists still in detention, supporters said.
“The international community can see that China has no human rights when even Nobel prize winners have been treated like this,” Beijing-based lawyer Yu Wensheng (余文生) said, adding that when Liu dies it would be “a heavy blow” for China’s human rights movement.
China has long been criticized for its harsh treatment of activists and dissidents, but since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took power in 2012 the controls on civil society have tightened.
Campaigners have said it is impossible to know the exact number of lawyers and activists in detention, because many are held incommunicado with no access to legal advice or their families.
In summer 2015, hundreds of legal staff and activists were detained under the so-called “709 crackdown,” which was the toughest against civil society for years.
Most of those rounded up were released on bail, but last year courts found six of them guilty of serious crimes, with sentences ranging from no additional jail time to seven years in prison.
Wang Quanzhang (王全璋), one of several leading rights lawyers whose fate remains unclear, was charged in January last year with “inciting subversion of state power” and “picking quarrels and provoking troubles,” but he has not yet stood trial and has been denied access to a lawyer.
Chinese courts have a conviction rate of 99.92 percent and there are growing concerns about the use of torture to extract confessions and the lack of effective defense.
In an annual report in March, Chinese Supreme People’s Court Chief Justice Zhou Qiang (周強) cited the harsh punishments imposed on rights defenders as the legal system’s top accomplishment last year.
“The crackdown on human rights defenders and activists has been getting more serious,” Amnesty International China researcher Patrick Poon (潘嘉偉) said.
The exact conditions of Liu’s parole are not known, but activists said he would likely be kept under police surveillance.
Close friends said his wife, Liu Xia (劉霞), who has been under house arrest in Beijing since 2010, has been allowed to visit him.
The US embassy in Beijing on Tuesday called on China to release the couple and allow Liu to choose his own doctors.
“Liu will never be free. He will still be tightly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party as his wife has been for so many years,” Chen said.
Activists are demanding to know if Liu received any medical treatment while he was in jail and why he was not given parole earlier.
“It’s very difficult to understand why his illness is only being treated at the last stage,” Poon said.
However, Richardson said China had a history of allowing “peaceful critics to become gravely ill and sometimes die in detention.”
Among them are Tibetan monk Tenzin Delek Rinpoche, who was 13 years into a life sentence for terrorism and separatism when he died in prison in July 2015.
Dissident Cao Shunli (曹順利) passed away in custody in March 2014 after allegedly being denied medical treatment for months.
“If Xi is going to stand up in public and say that China is a country governed by rule of law, how has this been allowed to happen,” Richardson said, calling for Xi and other officials to be held accountable.
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on
RSS