What is the anticipated timetable?
Almost a year after British voters asked to leave the EU, official exit talks started on Monday. British Secretary of State for Exiting the EU David Davis sat opposite Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief negotiator, at the European Commission headquarters in Brussels. With a handshake for the cameras, the two men began a technically arduous journey that is to seal Britain’s fate for decades to come.
The purpose of these talks is to unwind Britain’s 44-year-old relationship with the EU and map out future ties. Negotiators will be working against the clock. Deal or no deal, the UK will leave the EU on March 29, 2019.
However, the time for serious negotiations is actually shorter: Barnier hopes to conclude talks in October next year to allow time for the European Parliament to ratify a deal.
What happens first?
For Brussels, Brexit is like a marital breakdown: First comes the divorce, then the new relationship.
The EU has long said that Britain will not be allowed to start trade talks until it agrees on an outline deal on citizens’ rights, money and the Irish border.
Davis had threatened “the row of the summer” over this timetable, but on Monday it became clear that he had conceded the point.
“It is not when it starts, it is how it finishes,” he said. “Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.”
The British quickly discovered they had no leverage against an EU that had united on this point. The EU’s two-step sequence crystallized when Barnier visited the capitals of all the other 27 EU member states in winter last year. On this Brexit grand tour, the Irish pressed the case for prioritizing the border; Spain put Gibraltar on the table; and everyone wanted citizens’ rights and money sorted out quickly.
Barnier has his orders, agreed unanimously, after eight months of work. He cannot start trade talks without a fresh mandate from EU leaders. EU diplomats have never discussed a new mandate and had no intention of doing so.
Despite the loss of face, the UK might find that the EU sequence turns out to be convenient. British Prime Minister Theresa May did not win a mandate for her hard Brexit.
The political fight for a softer exit is expected to intensify. With so many unanswered questions about what Brexit means, getting started on formal negotiations and talking about citizens’ rights now suits the UK well.
When can Britain talk about trade?
Some Brussels observers think the EU is being too rigid and making unreasonable demands that trade is off the table. However, there is some flexibility: Trade talks can begin after “sufficient progress” on the divorce, a judgement EU leaders will make, in October or December, depending on how things are going.
If the UK passes the — deliberately ambiguous — “sufficient progress” test, talks can move on to trade and other areas, such as foreign policy, financial services, and police and judicial cooperation.
What are the sticking points?
Both sides on Monday repeated that they were prioritizing a rapid agreement on citizens’ rights to bring certainty for 3.5 million EU nationals in Britain and 1.2 million Britons on the continent.
However, the apparent consensus is deceptive: The EU is insisting that the European Court of Justice be the ultimate arbiter in resolving disputes on citizens’ rights, in theory extending the writ of the European court over Britain for a century. This role for the court would prove toxic for hardline Brexiters and is even controversial for some European jurists.
Failure to resolve this point will be a bad sign.
The EU also wants detailed guarantees on citizens’ rights, allowing people to live their lives as if Brexit never happened. However, that could mean in a few areas EU nationals have more rights than Britons, such as the right to bring a non-EU spouse into Britain regardless of income.
Davis has promised to set out the UK’s detailed position on Monday next week, while May is to explain her thinking to fellow EU leaders at a summit today.
Inevitably, there will be sound and fury over the Brexit bill. Various numbers have been mooted: 40 billion euros (US$44.5 billion), 60 billion euros net total, with 100 billion euros gross total grabbing the most headlines.
For now, the EU does not have a final number, but rather a range of scenarios, depending on the smoothness of Britain’s transition away from the EU.
While the EU is looking for detailed guarantees on citizens’ rights, the Brexit bill could be fudged until next year. The UK could even keep EU payments, such as farm subsidies, for two years, if it agreed to pay into the budget during that time.
Negotiators hope that by concentrating on the technicalities first and naming a number later, the final bill will be an easier sell for the British prime minister, because it can be presented as the price of a new deal.
However, the clearer the methodology, the easier it will be to do the math and the bigger the potential political storm. Diplomats worry that May has made no attempt to prepare public opinion for the Brexit bill or other inevitable compromises.
The fraught issue of the Irish border received the most attention on the first day of Brexit talks and is to be managed by leading officials on both sides.
British Permanent Secretary of the Department for Exiting the EU Oliver Robbins is to work with Sabine Weyand, Barnier’s deputy, on avoiding a hard border within Ireland.
However, the question will be difficult to resolve without knowing the UK’s intentions on remaining in the EU customs union, or what can be agreed with Brussels on tariffs.
What about a transition deal?
The EU expects to discuss a transition deal at a late stage in Brexit talks, possibly August next year.
Barnier has said a transitional agreement makes sense only when the UK knows where it is going.
Could anything interrupt or delay the talks?
Over the next 21 months there are to be elections, political accidents and a relentless swirl of events. When May still commanded a majority in the House of Commons, it was assumed that the talks would get serious after the German elections in autumn this year. Now the biggest uncertainty is an unstable British government led by a weak prime minister without a mandate for Brexit.
Since the Conservatives’ election debacle, EU diplomats do not know what kind of Brexit the British want. Nor are they certain about May’s political future and what her early departure could mean.
The Brexit clock will not stop for another snap election, even if formal talks are suspended. The best British negotiators could hope for would be a few weeks’ extension in March 2019. However, the EU will insist that the UK is gone ahead of European elections in May and June 2019.
Throughout the Brexit talks, the door remains open for the UK to change its mind and revoke its divorce letter. However, once Britain walks out, the door slams shut. The only way back in after summer 2019 would be for the UK to apply for EU membership.
A British minister would be back in Brussels to start talks all over again.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
RSS