Of all the issues that prompt talented Taiwanese to leave the nation, the quest for higher wages abroad is the most problematic, National Development Council Deputy Minister Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said a few days ago.
Due to the failure to bring about successful industrial transformation over the past dozen years, businesses are still struggling to make gross annual profits of 2 percent 3 percent. Of course they cannot pay top salaries for talented people.
Premier Lin Chuan (林全) has said that it would not be possible to solve the low-wage problem in the short term.
However, these officials’ views stem from a pro-industry bias and ignore the legal system.
Article 1 of the Taxpayer Rights Protection Act (納稅者權利保護法), that was passed in December last year, stipulates that the legislation was “enacted for the purposes of implementing the protection of the existence right, work right, property right, and other relevant basic rights in the Constitution of the Republic of China, insuring rights of taxpayers, achieving tax equity, and carrying through the due process of law.”
“The expense that taxpayers pay for maintaining their basic living in accordance with human dignity for themselves and their dependents shall not be taxed,” Article 4 of the act states.
This raises the question of whether the government has given enough consideration to this law and its implementation. Low wages are not the result of failed industrial transformation alone, but the miserable consequence of a national income structure distorted by a flawed legal system.
According to the Ministry of Finance’s Department of Overall Planning, the biggest reduction to this year’s income tax revenue is the special savings and investments deduction, which is to remove NT$33.6 billion (US$1.12 billion) from the overall sum.
Receiving an interest dividend of NT$270,000 requires savings of NT$27 million, but anyone with such large savings is treated as a high-income earner. Compared with blue collar workers and knowledge workers who are only exempt from taxes if they earn less than NT$128,000 and NT$180,000 per year, respectively, this kind of tax exemption should be reviewed and amended.
Taxes on income from real estate, shares and corporate profits make up the bulk of income tax revenue, and if taxes on these items were reduced or removed altogether, that would run counter to a fair tax system.
“Tax acts or any other acts with specific policy-oriented tax incentives shall provide a definite implementation period as well as attain the reasonable policy goal as its limit and nothing more. The enactment of tax incentives in the preceding paragraph shall be conducted by holding a public hearing and submitting a tax-form expenditure evaluation,” Article 6 of the Taxpayer Rights Protection Act states.
Has the government reviewed and amended the tax acts and regulations that distort national income structure in accordance with these two articles?
Those in power of listed and over-the-counter companies only own 5 percent of their company’s shares on paper, but due to flawed corporate legislation and because corporate democracy is still lacking, they can maintain power by buying up shares using power of attorney and employing corporate profits to overcompensate board directors, auditors and top-level managers, paying them annual salaries in excess of what an ordinary person could earn in several lifetimes. The question is if the government has ever taken a proper look at the unfairness of this legal system and if it plans to do anything about it.
By shirking his responsibility to solve the low-wage problem, is the premier doing the right thing by Taiwanese workers?
Lin Terng-yaw is a lawyer specializing in economic law.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist