Gulf Arab nations often get considered one giant family, as many ruling tribes intermarried and have long ties stretching back to the days before oil turned dusty fishing villages into skyscraper-studded metropolises.
However, if this week has proven anything, it is that every family fights.
The diplomatic standoff between Qatar and its neighbors has exposed long-standing faults running just under the surface of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), a regional body meant to serve as a counterbalance to Iran.
None of the key countries — Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) — appear to be backing down, calling into question the unity of the council just as it seeks to portray itself as standing up to Iran.
“The new hawkish policy reflects an end to a decades-long tradition in the Gulf cooperation countries that seeks to maintain dialogue irrespective of policy differences,” Eurasia Group Middle East director Ayham Kamel wrote, calling the damage to Gulf relations “irreparable.”
“Saudi Arabia’s relationship with [US] President [Donald] Trump is the linchpin of Riyadh’s new approach. The implicit message to all the Gulf leaders is that Saudi Arabia remains the center of gravity in Gulf affairs,” he added.
The GCC formed in 1981 in the wake of Iran’s Islamic Revolution overthrowing the shah and installing its clerically overseen government.
By the time ink dried on the agreement, Iraq had already invaded Iran, sparking a long, bloody war between the two nations that spilled into the waters of the Persian Gulf and worried the Sunni Arab members of the council.
Typically, heavyweight Saudi Arabia has dictated major foreign policy decisions across the council, which is headquartered in the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia, home to the holiest sites in Islam, views itself as the protector of the Sunni faith as well. Both it and the UAE also view themselves as providing the military power necessary to counter Iran, especially after the 2015 nuclear deal Tehran struck with world powers.
However, there always have been cracks.
The sultanate of Oman has long maintained its distance, serving as a crucial intermediary between Iran and the West.
Kuwait, home to Shiites and Sunnis living together in peace, has served as a mediator as well.
However, while those countries quietly stand apart, Qatar has become loud. While practicing Wahhabism, an ultra-conservative version of Islam standard in Saudi Arabia, Qatar allows women to drive and foreigners to drink alcohol.
Qatar openly embraces officials from the Muslim Brotherhood, a Sunni group that other Gulf nations view as a threat to their hereditary rule. It maintains relations with Iran as it shares a massive offshore natural gas field with the Islamic Republic and its Doha-based al-Jazeera news network did not hesitate to go hard after autocratic rulers amid the protests of the 2011 Arab Spring.
That, coupled with long-standing allegations from the West of Qatar allowing or even encouraging funding of Sunni extremists, appear to be what finally tipped Saudi Arabia and others into taking action.
Even Trump appeared to line up with them in a tweet on Tuesday, writing: “Perhaps this will be the beginning of the end of the horror of terrorism.”
Qatari Minister of Foreign Affairs Sheikh Mohammed Bin Abdulrahman Al Thani warned that the crisis raised “a big question mark” about the council.
“This brings about real questions about the future of the GCC nations, which are basically one people who share the same language and have extensive family ties among its people,” he told al-Jazeera. “That said, however, we reject that some in the GCC are trying to impose their will on Qatar or intervene in its internal affairs.”
Despite Mohammed’s strong words, Qatar is vulnerable. It imports the majority of its food, much of it over its now-shut land border with Saudi Arabia.
Emirati and Saudi government officials have offered no specifics about what they hope to achieve with isolating Qatar.
However, there have been some suggestions.
Sultan Sooud Al Qassemi, an outspoken member of the ruling family of the sheikhdom of Sharjah in the UAE, on Monday wrote that “it is likely that this time the Gulf states will demand the complete shuttering of the al-Jazeera TV network before any mediation can take place.”
Al Qassemi also identified other Qatari media outlets that could be closed, as well as said that the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas members, would need to be expelled.
“It must de-escalate the media coverage and must sever ties with extremist groups including, but not only, the Muslim Brotherhood and groups in Yemen,” Al Qassemi wrote in a column for Newsweek’s Web site. “Judging by the Qatari reaction so far, it seems the Gulf states’ patience will be tested.”
That is toned down compared to other columns, which include one in the Saudi government-aligned daily newspaper Arab News calling Qatari officials “pathological liars.”
Others said that Qatar stood on a diplomatic precipice.
“Qatar cannot continue to face two ways, supporting groups and regimes that are actively harming the region,” Abu Dhabi’s state-owned newspaper the National said in an editorial on Tuesday. “The GCC is a club, with common goals. If Qatar cannot agree with those goals, it should not hope to remain part of the club.”
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more