China’s plan for a maritime “Silk Road” to Europe is helping channel funds to Southeast Asia for roads, railways and ports, but amid the deals bonanza, one country risks missing out.
Despite strong historical and cultural ties to China, the tiny city-state of Singapore has found itself in Beijing’s crosshairs, in part for its stance over territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
As other Southeast Asian leaders lined up to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a summit in Beijing last week for his “One Belt, One Road” initiative, Singapore was represented by Minister of National Development Lawrence Wong (黃循財).
Illustration: Yusha
China views Singapore as being less supportive of Xi’s plan, because unlike other nations that announced their leaders would attend without requiring a formal invitation, Singapore sought an invite, people familiar with the matter said.
They asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the information.
“The cooler political relationship between Singapore and China could have ripple effects which influence economic and trade relations,” said Lu Jianren (陸建仁), a researcher at the China-ASEAN Research Institute at China’s Guangxi University.
“Singapore has been less proactive to work with China while many leaders in the region showed greater enthusiasm that they want Beijing to be more involved in Southeast Asian growth,” Lu said.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“I wouldn’t say we have major problems; we’ve had some issues and some incidents,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) said of China in an interview aired by the BBC in March.
Singapore is Southeast Asia’s wealthiest nation and its position straddling the Strait of Malacca lends it strategic importance as a gateway to the South China Sea.
As such, it should stand to benefit from Xi’s effort to better connect China to the rest of the world through trade and infrastructure.
China remains Singapore’s largest trading partner. Singapore is still the second-largest investor in China, even as the amount slipped from US$6.97 billion in 2015 to US$6.18 billion last year, according to China’s official figures.
Singapore has been involved in China’s economic development since the early 1990s.
It helped build an industrial park in 1994 in Suzhou which was regarded as a model for attracting foreign investment. There has since been a development in the northern port of Tianjin and most recently a project in Chongqing aimed at boosting the regional logistics hub.
Still, deals signed during the forum in Beijing point to the political mood: Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak inked nine documents with China for proposed investments worth US$7.2 billion, with Xi describing ties as their “best ever.”
Indonesia signed a US$5 billion loan facility after Indonesian President Joko Widodo met Xi over the nation’s Jakarta-Bandung high-speed rail link.
Vietnamese President Tran Dai Quang used his first state visit to China to seek a boost in imports of Vietnamese farm produce, according to the Saigon Times.
The nations signed five documents on economic and technological cooperation.
For Singapore, Wong signed a memorandum with China to “enable the two sides to enjoy better bilateral relations, more substantive economic ties and closer people-to-people exchanges.”
He said Singapore could join Hong Kong and London in facilitating lending to projects aimed at improving connectivity along the trade routes.
Two years ago, Singapore-China ties were riding high.
In late 2015, the city-state of 5.3 million hosted the first summit between leaders from China and Taiwan since the two sides clashed in a civil war seven decades ago, with Xi meeting then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Former Singaporean prime minister Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀), who led the city-state for 31 years, was known for his pragmatism as the nation opened up its economy and financial sector to nations from China to the US, and as someone whose advice was sought by other leaders.
A number of hiccups last year put a cloud over ties.
Singapore, as coordinator for the ASEAN-China relationship, was caught up in public wrangling over how ASEAN should respond as a collective to China’s claims to most of the South China Sea.
The city-state does not contest the waters itself.
Singapore lets the US Navy use it as launchpad to send littoral combat ships and Poseidon surveillance aircraft into the South China Sea.
In November last year, Hong Kong seized nine Singaporean infantry carrier vehicles en route from Taiwan on a container ship after being used in exercises. While Singapore had long trained in Taiwan, the shipment prompted a protest from Beijing, and it was not until January that Singapore secured its release.
Singapore was also a vocal champion of a 12-nation US-led Pacific trade pact of which China was not a member. The deal was a hallmark of former US president Barack Obama’s engagement with the region, and was abandoned by US President Donald Trump when he took office.
Still, China Association of Southeast Asian Studies deputy president Zhai Kun (翟崑) said ties between Singapore and China should eventually recover.
“Singapore has showed some goodwill gestures that the country could play an important financial role in the initiative, and the two nations have a tradition to do business,” he said.
Chinese Communist Party Politburo member Zhao Leji (趙樂際) on Tuesday last week led a delegation to the biannual Singapore-China Forum in the city-state.
In a meeting with Lee Hsien Loong, the two hailed a “strong and substantial relationship.”
Meanwhile, there remains unease in parts of Southeast Asia about China’s military expansion and what its growth as a regional power might entail.
“They are the only one around with extra money to make new investments in Southeast Asia,” said Oh Ei Sun (胡逸山), principal adviser to the Pacific Research Centre in Malaysia. “Strategically, they still have a long way to go before catching up the breadth and depth of American influence here which dates back decades.”
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the