A hostile, nuclear-armed neighbor with heavy artillery aimed at their capital. Cronyism in government. Corruption in business.
These issues and more are weighing on South Koreans as they head to a presidential election on Tuesday, but much of the campaign has revolved around a wild card, one the candidates are fighting to prove they are uniquely equipped to handle: US President Donald Trump.
In his first months in office, Trump’s contradictory statements about the Korean Peninsula have shattered South Koreans’ image of the US leader as a symbol of stability in their 60-year alliance with Washington.
Trump has threatened to end what he called a “horrible” free-trade agreement with South Korea.
He has said the nation should pay for an advanced US missile defense system, contradicting an earlier commitment from Washington.
He has warned of a “major, major conflict” with North Korea, while also saying he would be “honored” to meet with the North’s leader, Kim Jong-un, under the right circumstances.
How to manage “the Trump risk,” as local news media put it, has become a major campaign issue. The candidates are falling over themselves to show they would be the best at handling him, either by drawing him closer or by being tougher.
“National security has become a dominant election issue this year thanks largely to Trump,” said Koh Yu-hwan, a professor of North Korean studies at Dongguk University in Seoul. “Whether he intended it or not, Trump ended up intervening in the South Korean election.”
At the least, many South Koreans fear a rift in the close relationship with Washington. At worst, some fear Trump could do something impulsive, like ordering a military attack on North Korea, with little regard for the devastation it would cause here in the South.
The leading conservative candidate, Hong Joon-pyo, sought to calm jitters by swearing that if he is elected, he will hold a summit meeting with Trump aboard the USS Carl Vinson, the aircraft carrier Trump recently dispatched to Korean waters in a show of force against the North.
Ahn Cheol-soo, a centrist, has pushed what he sees as his advantage over other candidates: He and Trump both went to the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
He says that connection will help him build rapport with Trump.
Moon Jae-in, the Democratic Party candidate, who surveys project will be the winner, has also vowed to meet Trump in one of his first acts as president.
However, he indicated that he would be more confrontational.
He has said that instead of avoiding friction with Washington, South Korea should “learn to say no.”
He and many South Korean voters have been outraged by Trump’s recent suggestion that their nation pay US$1 billion for a missile-defense battery the US installed last week.
Moon asked a cheering crowd at a campaign rally this week: “Which candidate can do a proud diplomacy, saying what we need to say to the Americans?”
Moon represents liberal political forces in South Korea who say that under its conservative and pro-US leaders, the nation’s alliance has become too “hierarchical” and too “tilted” in Washington’s favor.
Liberals have also called for dialogue with North Korea, saying that Trump was wasting his time if he was waiting for China to enforce UN sanctions forcefully enough to stop the North’s nuclear program.
Moon seeks to bring back a version of the “Sunshine Policy,” under which South Korea promoted dialogue and economic exchanges with the North from 1998 to 2008 to help build trust and lessen Chinese influence on the northern half of the divided peninsula.
Those on the left view the Trump administration’s talk of a “military option” against the North as dangerous. They also do not want their nation dragged into a hegemonic struggle between the US and China, South Korea’s biggest trade partner.
Trump’s rough diplomacy could shake a delicate balance in Northeast Asia, prompting South Korea to redefine its alliance with Washington and move closer to China, analysts say.
“Washington has grown used to conservative governments in Seoul that back a hardline approach to the North, so it could be an awkward and painful period of adjustment in getting used to liberals’ very different philosophy of inter-Korean relations,” said John Delury, a professor at the Graduate School of International Studies at Yonsei University in Seoul.
South Korea’s alliance with the US has gone through some rough patches, as when former US presidents Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter threatened to pull out US troops and when violent anti-American protests rocked college campuses in the 1980s and beyond.
However, South Koreans have never dealt with a US president like Trump, who appears to question the relationship. How well their leader gets along with Washington tends to affect their sense of security.
“Trump is unpredictable like a rugby ball, and that’s adding uncertainty to the alliance,” said Lee Byong-chul, a senior fellow at the Institute for Peace and Cooperation in Seoul.
Delury said that for South Koreans, who were “used to the US playing a stabilizing and benevolent role,” the Trump presidency was “uncharted territory.”
“The combination of Donald Trump as the American president and a progressive as South Korea’s president may be toxic.” said David Straub, a former US diplomat and the author of the book Anti-Americanism in Democratizing South Korea.
During his campaign, Trump irked South Koreans by repeatedly accusing them of getting a free ride in their national defense and not paying enough for the US military presence here.
After his election, he sent top aides, including US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, to reaffirm that he was with the South Koreans “100 percent.”
Yet he also hurt their national pride by saying Korea used to be “a part of China.”
Some accused Trump of ignoring their nation when he discussed North Korea with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on April 24, but called no one in Seoul.
Last month, Trump’s administration stepped on a hot-button election issue in South Korea by pushing ahead with the deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD).
Conservative candidates like Hong called for an early deployment to guard against North Korean missiles, even though China threatened retaliation against South Korea if it allowed the powerful US radar on its doorstep.
Moon repeatedly warned that Washington should postpone the deployment to give the next South Korean government time to review it, as his liberal supporters accused the US of foisting the system on them.
Last week, not only did the US push ahead with the deployment, but Trump also said South Korea should pay for THAAD, contradicting an earlier agreement that Washington would pay for the system and Seoul would provide the land and basic infrastructure.
On Sunday, the White House national security adviser, Lieutenant General Herbert McMaster, called his South Korean counterpart, Kim Kwan-jin, and “the two reconfirmed what has already been agreed” about the system’s costs, Kim’s office said in a statement.
Trump’s THAAD comment was also a huge letdown for conservative South Koreans who supported the deployment, even arguing that a boycott of South Korean goods and other retaliations from China were a price South Korea should pay willingly to protect the alliance with the US.
“Our fear that Trump treats everything as a money deal and in terms of gain and loss has become a reality,” the leading conservative daily, Chosun Ilbo, said in an editorial over the weekend, reporting the “shock, betrayal and anger many South Koreans have felt.”
In a news conference this week, Song Young-gil, Moon’s main campaign adviser, was more blunt: “Because of our obsequious diplomacy over THAAD, the Chinese are retaliating against us and the Americans have stabbed us in the back.”
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
RSS