The British government has been accused of “running scared” of diesel drivers and attempting to bully judges over its last-minute bid to delay the publication of its clean air plan.
Politicians and environmental groups said ministers were “hiding behind the election” to justify delaying publication of the government’s long-awaited proposals instead of tackling the nation’s air pollution crisis.
Health experts said the lack of government action had potentially put thousands of lives at risk.
“It is frankly outrageous that the government thinks it can continue to bury its head in the sand about the serious health impacts of air quality in London and across the country,” London Mayor Sadiq Khan said. “The prime minister has once again missed this golden opportunity to show real leadership in tackling and improving the air we breathe, which should have been done well before the pre-election period.”
The government had been under a court direction to produce tougher draft measures to tackle illegal levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution — largely caused by diesel traffic — by 4pm on Monday. The original plans had been dismissed by judges as so poor as to be unlawful.
However, after the announcement by British Prime Minister Theresa May of a general election on June 8, ministers lodged a lengthy application to the court late on Friday last week. It asked judges to allow them to breach the Monday deadline to “comply with pre-election propriety rules.”
British Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Andrea Leadsom was summoned to parliament on Monday to answer urgent questions.
Cabinet Office guidance says that purdah rules can be lifted in exceptional circumstances, including for consultations on safeguarding public health.
During the debate, Leadsom was asked if she considered toxic air to be an “emergency” — as it was blamed for up to 40,000 early deaths every year.
In reply she only acknowledged that it was a “very significant and urgent concern,” refusing to use the word “emergency.”
She said she was “personally deeply committed to the importance of ensuring clean air,” but had been told by officials in the Cabinet Office that it would breach purdah rules to publish the plans in the run-up to the election.
The government has applied to publish draft plans on June 30, followed by the full policy in September, she said.
Leadsom, who also said that it was the second application to delay publication that her department had submitted to the courts, insisted the move would not postpone the roll out of the proposals.
Labour shadow environment secretary Sue Hayman said the government’s actions were unacceptable.
“The situation has gone from bad to worse on this government’s watch and has now escalated into what the DEFRA committee calls an public health emergency,” she said, referring to the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.
“It is unacceptable to hide behind the election to delay publishing her plans. Cabinet Office rules are clear that purdah is not an excuse to delay acting in vital public health matters,” she added.
“The government is trying to bully judges into backing off. Ministers should not be playing games with people’s health, especially children’s,” Mary Creagh, Labour chair of the House of Commons’ environment audit committee, said in a statement.
The government’s plans are likely to include a package of measures to make diesel cars less popular. These could include a diesel scrappage scheme, a hike in vehicle excise duty for diesel vehicles and possible congestion charging zones in some cities.
Green Party coleader Caroline Lucas said the government’s failure to publish its plans suggested it was running scared of the diesel lobby and diesel drivers ahead of the election.
Ministers had “utterly failed to get a grip on the air pollution crisis,” she added.
“[It] is now attempting to stitch up judges and cajole them into submission. Such blatant bullying is simply unacceptable,” she said.
Lawyers from the environmental law group ClientEarth, which successfully took the government to court over its air quality plans, were still waiting to hear back from the court when Monday’s deadline passed.
“The unacceptable last-minute nature of the government’s application late on Friday night, after the court had closed, has meant that we have spent the weekend considering our response,” ClientEarth chief executive James Thornton said. “We are still examining our next steps. This is a question of public health and not of politics, and for that reason we believe that the plans should be put in place without delay.”
The next move is in the hands of the judges in the case. It is thought likely that in the next few days they will ask ClientEarth to respond to the government’s application. A hearing will then be called at which they will decide whether to back the government’s proposed delay.
The scale of the air pollution crisis was revealed in a joint Guardian-Greenpeace investigation this month showing hundreds of thousands of children were being educated within 150m of a road where levels of nitrogen dioxide from diesel traffic breached legal limits.
Last week, figures obtained by Labour showed that more than 38 million people, representing 59.3 percent of the UK population, were living in areas where levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution were above legal limits.
Research consistently shows that exposure to traffic fumes is harmful to children and adults. Children are more vulnerable because their lungs are still developing and exposure to nitrogen dioxide reduces lung growth, causes long-term ill health and can result in premature death.
British Lung Foundation chief executive Penny Woods said that potentially thousands of premature deaths might have been avoided if the government had acted sooner.
“The government’s failure to produce a new air quality plan aimed at reducing the nation’s toxic air is a huge disappointment. It has been two years since the first court case. It would be fair to say that the equivalent of 80,000 early deaths could have been reduced in this time,” Woods said.
Nitrogen dioxide emissions from diesel traffic cause 23,500 of the 40,000 premature deaths from air pollution each year, DEFRA figures show.
In April last year, lawmakers said air pollution was a public health emergency.
On Monday, a DEFRA spokesman said: “We are seeking an extension to comply with pre-election propriety rules.”
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence