One of the most cited statistics about China might well be the number of Chinese who have been lifted out of poverty over the past 35 years. At more than 800 million, it is a huge number — and an extraordinary feat. Indeed, no other country has achieved such a level of poverty reduction in such a short period.
However, what about the millions of Chinese who have remained behind?
China’s government is committed to finishing the task, with the aim of reducing rural poverty essentially to zero by 2020. The authorities first made the pledge at the UN in 2015, and have reiterated it in subsequent official settings.
However, fulfilling that promise — which would entail improving the well-being of about 45 million people, about equivalent to Sudan’s entire population — will carry significant costs.
Poverty reduction, like so many important endeavors, is subject to the law of diminishing returns: The more you do something, the less productive your efforts become. Think of winding a watch: The more it is wound, the more resistance builds up in the mainspring and the more energy it takes to move the stem the same distance.
When it comes to poverty reduction, the people who benefit first are most likely those who were best equipped to do so, owing to, say, their background or geography. By the time there are only a few — or even a few million — left, one can expect reaching them to be much harder.
China’s experience illustrates this phenomenon perfectly. During the first seven years of China’s official “reform and opening up,” which began in 1978, it is estimated that about 110 million people annually rose out of poverty.
For the next 15 years — from 1985 to 2000 — the pace of progress slowed considerably, with about 26 million people moving above the poverty line each year. From 2000 to 2015, the figure stood at a little more than 22 million per year. The government’s target now is to lift 10 million people out of poverty annually.
As the pace of poverty-reduction has slowed, its costs have risen — a trend illustrated in a new UN report, together with World Bank data.
In 2000, lifting a person out of poverty in China cost the central government about US$48 per year, in nominal terms. By 2010, this figure had increased more than threefold, to US$150 per year. Now that the government is working to reach the most remote people — those without access to roads, electricity, or clean water — the cost exceeds US$200 per year.
This is not to say that China will not be able to meet its 2020 target. On the contrary, the government’s plans and implementation appear as strong as ever.
Last year, the government exceeded its target, with 12.4 million people escaping rural poverty, and the budget for this year is 30 percent larger, meaning that at least US$1,000 has been allocated for each of the 10 million people China’s government plans to lift out of poverty this year.
However, as the government attempts to “get to zero” on rural poverty — by moving all people above the national rural poverty line of 2,230 yuan (US$324) per year — it should not lose sight of broader poverty-related challenges.
China continues to experience rapid urbanization — a phenomenon that contributed substantially to past poverty reduction, but that also places a growing number of urban dwellers at risk of destitution.
According to official figures, the average income of the poorest 5 percent of households in Chinese cities amounts to about US$1,128. That is about 3.5 times China’s rural poverty line.
However, overall, the average income in cities is at least four times higher than that in the countryside, suggesting that living on such a budget might be even tougher than living at the rural poverty line. That does not even account for the many migrant workers who live under the radar in cities and are likely to earn even less than the poorest 5 percent.
These forms of poverty might be even harder to address, not least because China has less experience doing so. Given this, just as China’s successful efforts to reduce rural poverty can serve as a model for others, other countries’ successes in managing urban poverty can — and should — help to guide China’s efforts.
China is far from alone in focusing on the fight to end poverty; indeed, the very first Sustainable Development Goal calls for an end to poverty in all of its manifestations by 2030. With the process becoming increasingly challenging and costly, looking across borders could prove vital to enabling all Chinese to live decent, dignified lives.
Hannah Ryder is a former head of policy and partnerships for the UN Development Program in China.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at