China’s announcement of a 7 percent rise in military spending for the year came shortly after US President Donald Trump called for a 10 percent increase in the US’ defense budget, prompting renewed scrutiny of how the two countries’ capabilities compare.
While the US military remains the dominant force in Asia and the world, China has been moving from quantity to quality and is catching up quickly in equipment, organization and capability, and is increasingly able to project power far from its shores.
Rapid economic growth, lavish spending and a desire to regain China’s historical role as East Asia’s leading power are helping drive the moves.
Below is a comparison of the present state of the two militaries, based on figures found in recent US government research on China’s capabilities and information from defense think tanks and government Web sites. Some figures are estimates or approximations.
THE BIG PICTURE
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has a total of 2.3 million personnel under arms, constituting the world’s largest standing military. It provides only partial information about its order of battle, the PLA’s mission and future plans, although outside analysts have produced detailed estimates.
US troop strength varies depending on need, but as of Jan. 31, there were 1.4 million active service members spread throughout the services.
China announced this week that defense spending would rise by 7 percent this year to 1.044 trillion yuan (US$151.3 billion at the current exchange rate). While China has the world’s second-largest defense budget, it is still just a fraction of what the US spends, even if analysts’ estimates of hidden additional spending are taken into account.
Trump’s request for an additional US$54 billion in spending would bring the US defense budget to a record US$603 billion, and that is before including tens of billions of US dollars for overseas military operations. If approved, the increase would mean the US was spending 3.4 percent of its GDP on defense, up from 3.2 percent of GDP last year.
China says its budget this year would equal 1.3 percent of GDP.
Owing to the PLA’s origins as a guerrilla army and former tensions along its land border with Russia, the ground forces continue to dominate, with 1.6 million personnel and a weighty emphasis on armored vehicles (9,150) and heavy artillery (6,246).
The US Army boasts 460,000 personnel, with another 182,000 in the US Marine Corps. It has a smaller emphasis on artillery (1,299) and armored vehicles (8,848), but places a greater emphasis on air support and special forces operations.
The US can boast more than 13,000 aircraft of all types to China’s nearly 3,000. The gap is especially great in helicopters, where the US has more than 6,000 to China’s 802.
Despite having fewer aircraft, some of which are under the PLA Navy, the PLA Air Force has 398,000 personnel to 308,000 for the US Air Force.
Both air forces are seeking to upgrade their aircraft, although the introduction of the fifth-generation F-22 and F-35 puts the US several years ahead.
China’s stealth fighters remain in the prototype stage, although it has managed to replace more than half of its fighter fleet with fourth-generation aircraft.
The PLA Navy has many more vessels (714 to 415), but the US has more where it counts in terms of power projection.
The US has 10 aircraft carriers to China’s one (although more are being built), 62 destroyers to China’s 32 and 75 submarines to China’s 68.
The US Navy has 323,000 personnel to China’s 235,000, reflecting the breadth and depth of a service that operates worldwide.
China’s navy has made strides in that direction since it established a permanent overseas presence by joining in multinational anti-piracy patrols off Somalia in 2008, and has begun exercising in the Western Pacific beyond the “first island chain” that blocks its access to open seas.
The PLA has a completely separate branch, the PLA Rocket Force, to operate its formidable arsenal of short, medium and long-range missiles, including those capable of delivering nuclear weapons.
Estimates say China has a stockpile of approximately 260 nuclear warheads for delivery by nearly 150 land-based ballistic missiles and 48 sea-based ballistic missiles, as well as bombers.
The US has an estimated 1,740 nuclear warheads deployed for delivery by the same means.
China’s development of the DF-21D ballistic missile, which is thought to be capable of threatening aircraft carriers, has garnered much attention, although it remains untested in a conflict.
China has not fought a conflict outside its borders since it invaded Vietnam in 1979 and it officially eschews overseas alliances. Nonetheless, the PLA has been expanding abroad, from garrisons atop artificial islands in the South China Sea to UN peacekeeping operations, joint naval exercises with Russia in the Mediterranean and the construction of its first overseas base in the Horn of Africa nation of Djibouti.
The US military, by comparison, operates in more than 100 countries, maintains a worldwide network of alliances and is engaged in major conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq and, increasingly, Syria.
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
There are few areas where Beijing, Taipei, and Washington find themselves in agreement these days, but one of them is that the situation in the Taiwan Strait is growing more dangerous. Such a shared assessment quickly breaks down, though, when the question turns to identifying sources of rising tensions. Several Chinese experts and officials I have consulted with recently have argued that Beijing’s increasingly belligerent behavior in the Taiwan Strait is driven mostly by fear. According to this narrative, Beijing is worried that unless it puts a brake on Taiwan’s move away from the mainland, Taiwan could be “lost” forever. They
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), who died on Thursday last week, coined the phrase “new Taiwanese” and used it in some of his public speeches. The concept of “new Taiwanese” was an important link in the chain of his political thought. Lee proposed the term in August 1998 on the eve of the anniversary of the end of the Pacific War. His intention was to consolidate a common understanding around the idea of “new Taiwanese,” and to embody the Taiwanese spirit of never giving up and not fearing hardship, and to create bright prospects for generations to come. However, after