The Ministry of Justice has proposed three ways to reform the prosecutorial system: raise the prosecution threshold, increase public participation and reinforce the quality of evaluations. These changes will be welcome, and for many people, cannot happen soon enough.
In the past, prosecutors have been used to further the ends of those in power, state violence has been brought to bear on dissidents and some prosecutors have even colluded with criminals. Although angry about these issues, the public had previously not dared do anything about it.
In an article published by Chinese-language media on Feb. 29 last year calling on President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to change the public’s perception of the judiciary, Taipei District Court Judge Lin Meng-huang (林孟皇) said that it was inevitable that the prosecutorial and judicial systems would become the target of review and reform — due to their roles as accomplices to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) former authoritarian rule — and that 70 percent to 80 percent of the public does not trust judges and prosecutors to deal with cases fairly. One year later, rereading that article brings up complex feelings.
In 2006, nine academic specialists and contractors, including then-National Science Council deputy chairman Shieh Ching-jyh (謝清志), were accused of suspected irregularities regarding a contract awarded by the council to reduce high-speed train vibrations near the Southern Taiwan Science Park. After a six-year trial, a not guilty verdict was delivered, leaving the defendants exhausted and financially drained. Shieh’s wife said she had to sell property worth NT$3 million (US$97,529 at the current exchange rate) to pay legal fees, and still came up short. They subsequently tried to sue the prosecutor for wrongful indictment, but the case was thrown out.
According to Article 125 of the Criminal Code and Article 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法), as well as Supreme Court interpretations, wrongly accused members of the public have no legal recourse to sue negligent prosecutors.
In an article published by Chinese-language media on Nov. 2, 2014, regarding problems with prosecutions and penalties and possible reforms, Lin Shu-kai (林書楷) said that provisions of the codes needed to be reviewed and amended. For example, Article 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be amended to stipulate that “the victim of a crime may initiate a private prosecution.” Essentially, the indirect victim of a crime is also a victim of the crime, and that person should be able to initiative a private prosecution against prosecutors who abuse their power.
The first hearing of the OBI Pharma Inc (台灣浩鼎) case — in which former Academia Sinica president Wong Chi-huey (翁啟惠) has been charged with corruption — took place on Feb. 15. Wong has said prosecutors abused their power by taking the case to court, and in doing so caused significant damage to himself, his family and Academia Sinica. Wong said that he would vigorously defend his innocence, while prosecutors have called for a travel ban to be imposed on him. Should Wong be found innocent, what legal liability will the prosecutors face?
In a nation run by the rule of law, there must be evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that a crime has been committed. The burden of producing this evidence is on prosecutors, not defendants. However, defendants are often required to produce evidence of their own innocence.
The ministry should add liability for prosecutors who abuse their power to its list of reforms to meet the public’s expectations and safeguard human dignity and rights.
Chen Yi-nan is director of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking