To lift the GDP growth curve from 1 percent to 2 percent, the government is working on a development plan with massive spending on infrastructure projects. In response to lawmakers’ questions during a legislative session on Friday, Premier Lin Chuan (林全) said the government plans to use a special budget to pay for the public works and expects that an increase in public investment could help boost the nation’s economy.
How much the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government plans to earmark for the so-called “forward-looking infrastructure plan” and its expected time frame remains to be seen, as the Cabinet is still finalizing the details before it is submitted to the Legislative Yuan next month.
However, the government seems ambitious. The National Development Council set GDP growth targets of between 2 and 2.5 percent for this year, and 2.5 to 3 percent over the next four years. The targets are higher than the estimates made by several local and foreign research institutes, but are still conservative compared with the average annual economic growth rate of 3.6 percent Taiwan registered from 2010 to last year.
However, the rumored investment amount for the infrastructure plan — from NT$800 billion to NT$1.3 trillion (US$26 billion to US$42 billion) over four to eight years — have raised the eyebrows of many people, as it shows the government’s ambition to pursue higher growth despite the challenge of meeting its new growth objectives.
Infrastructure is the backbone of economic capacity and a test of how a government effectively delivers public works. Such plans not only set out a government’s vision for the economy, but also challenge its strategies and willpower. A well-developed plan details policymakers’ commitment to infrastructure investment in targeted areas (such as digital communications, transportation, “green” energy and water resources) and provides motivation for greater private-sector investment.
Therefore, project assessment, planning and selection are important. As local ministers rush to submit infrastructure project proposals, the Cabinet should seriously consider what it would take to support them. Without appropriate assessment and planning, some public facilities could be left unused and become nothing but a waste of space and resources. Project selection should involve less political interference and not be used as an attempt to woo voters. Taxpayers’ money should be spent generating more jobs and improving labor productivity, rather than paying off local political leaders.
Most importantly, the key to success is implementation, which means effectively carrying out the goals described in the plan — from the coordination of various activities to the supervision of project participants, and from the management of budgets to communicating with the public. Cooperation, transparency and accountability are essential for effective implementation.
With DPP lawmakers holding a legislative majority, approval for a massive public spending budget is unlikely to take much time, and then the Cabinet could work on fiscal stimulus and infrastructure spending. While most public works take time to complete and are not expected to work their magic on the economy in the short term, a well-developed infrastructure plan represents the government’s blueprint to rebuild the nation’s economy and a solemn pledge to achieve improvement in productivity, living standards and environmental protection, which it must take seriously.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
RSS