Amendments to the Electricity Act (電業法) are aimed at phasing out nuclear power generation by 2025 and liberalizing the market. This ambitious policy poses challenges as well as opportunities for “renewable” energy trade and investment.
Taiwan’s energy import dependence is about 98 percent. An efficient legal framework for cross-border energy transfer is crucial to achieving energy sustainability and security.
Internationally, the Energy Charter Treaty is the only legally binding framework that is tailored to the precise needs of the sector. Despite its initial focus on industrial cooperation within Europe, the treaty has expanded its geographical application since the 1990s with signatories across Asia, Africa and Latin America. The treaty has become an East-West gateway for energy trade and investment.
The treaty is based on a core principle that all nations mutually benefit from the international free flow of capital, resources and technological innovations. A balanced international legal foundation is therefore necessary for consolidating long-term cooperation in the energy sector.
In this context, Taiwan could have three advantages as a signatory of the treaty.
First, the binding investment protection devices provide a climate of stability for both foreign and local investors. The dispute settlement mechanism offers an alternative to other national or regional dispute resolutions, such as when state-run oil company CPC Corp, Taiwan, faced compensation-related risks in two expropriation cases involving Venezuela in 2013.
Second, the treaty can help the nation, as the world’s fifth-largest importer and consumer of liquefied natural gas to secure reliable long-distance energy transit flows. Article 7 of the charter requires member states to respect the principle of freedom of transit and not to interrupt established global transit flows by imposing any unreasonable delays, restrictions or charges.
The treaty’s provisions are also more detailed than the WTO framework in terms of energy trade and investment. The treaty would be complementary to Taiwan’s WTO membership and provide added value to energy sector development.
Third, the treaty pays special attention to the environmental effects of energy-related activities and improving energy efficiency, such as the Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspect in Article 19.
This feature could trigger further legal innovations in Taiwan’s domestic environmental, energy and related commercial regulations.
In 2014, the treaty secretariat was invited to attend the annual APEC Energy Ministerial Meeting, exemplifying the role of the treaty in the Asia-Pacific region. Taiwan chairs the APEC’s Energy Working Group and already had direct contact with the secretariat in 2015 through the Knowledge Sharing Platform to Energy Smart Communities proposal.
If Taiwan were to become a treaty signatory it would be valuable stepping stone enabling access to the meetings, documents and, more importantly, a network of global energy governance.
The negotiation process employed to join the WTO in 2002 provides a precedent and some strategic insights, since China is now also a treaty observer.
Meanwhile, the treaty Industry Advisory Panel also welcomes participation from the private energy industries. CPC Taiwan, Taiwan Power Co, industrial associations and other energy corporations could consider the potential opportunities provided by this avenue.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS