Amendments to the Electricity Act (電業法) are aimed at phasing out nuclear power generation by 2025 and liberalizing the market. This ambitious policy poses challenges as well as opportunities for “renewable” energy trade and investment.
Taiwan’s energy import dependence is about 98 percent. An efficient legal framework for cross-border energy transfer is crucial to achieving energy sustainability and security.
Internationally, the Energy Charter Treaty is the only legally binding framework that is tailored to the precise needs of the sector. Despite its initial focus on industrial cooperation within Europe, the treaty has expanded its geographical application since the 1990s with signatories across Asia, Africa and Latin America. The treaty has become an East-West gateway for energy trade and investment.
The treaty is based on a core principle that all nations mutually benefit from the international free flow of capital, resources and technological innovations. A balanced international legal foundation is therefore necessary for consolidating long-term cooperation in the energy sector.
In this context, Taiwan could have three advantages as a signatory of the treaty.
First, the binding investment protection devices provide a climate of stability for both foreign and local investors. The dispute settlement mechanism offers an alternative to other national or regional dispute resolutions, such as when state-run oil company CPC Corp, Taiwan, faced compensation-related risks in two expropriation cases involving Venezuela in 2013.
Second, the treaty can help the nation, as the world’s fifth-largest importer and consumer of liquefied natural gas to secure reliable long-distance energy transit flows. Article 7 of the charter requires member states to respect the principle of freedom of transit and not to interrupt established global transit flows by imposing any unreasonable delays, restrictions or charges.
The treaty’s provisions are also more detailed than the WTO framework in terms of energy trade and investment. The treaty would be complementary to Taiwan’s WTO membership and provide added value to energy sector development.
Third, the treaty pays special attention to the environmental effects of energy-related activities and improving energy efficiency, such as the Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspect in Article 19.
This feature could trigger further legal innovations in Taiwan’s domestic environmental, energy and related commercial regulations.
In 2014, the treaty secretariat was invited to attend the annual APEC Energy Ministerial Meeting, exemplifying the role of the treaty in the Asia-Pacific region. Taiwan chairs the APEC’s Energy Working Group and already had direct contact with the secretariat in 2015 through the Knowledge Sharing Platform to Energy Smart Communities proposal.
If Taiwan were to become a treaty signatory it would be valuable stepping stone enabling access to the meetings, documents and, more importantly, a network of global energy governance.
The negotiation process employed to join the WTO in 2002 provides a precedent and some strategic insights, since China is now also a treaty observer.
Meanwhile, the treaty Industry Advisory Panel also welcomes participation from the private energy industries. CPC Taiwan, Taiwan Power Co, industrial associations and other energy corporations could consider the potential opportunities provided by this avenue.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
As the incursions by China into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone intensify, the international community’s anxiety has risen over the question of whether the US military would become directly involved in the case of an attack on Taiwan. Washington’s long-held policy of “strategic ambiguity” does little to ease the trepidation. The rationale universally espoused on “strategic ambiguity” is that an announced commitment from Washington to directly defend Taiwan would encourage Taiwanese independence and consequently bring forth a Chinese military attack and a possible nuclear confrontation between two superpowers. However, this line of argument could soon lose steam if the subject is viewed from
Having deceived the world about its nuclear capabilities while preparing for an arms race, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is now using its increasing nuclear forces for virtual nuclear coercion. This new threat will continue until the United States, Japan, and Taiwan can restore the CCP’s sense of fear. This dynamic is a familiar one for Taiwan. As the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) capabilities have grown, its inhibitions about conducting larger and more frequent coercive military demonstrations have shrunk. The PLA now more openly practices for the destruction of Taiwan’s democracy and the murder of its citizens. In the nuclear realm,
In an unprecedented move, a group of democratic nations led by the US, UK and EU in a joint statement on Tuesday accused the Chinese Ministry of State Security of having carried out a major cyberattack earlier this year and stealing data from at least 30,000 organizations worldwide, including governments, universities and firms in key industries. Western officials were reportedly perplexed by the attack’s brazen execution and unparalleled scale. In an article on the attack, BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera wrote: “Western spies are still struggling to understand why Chinese behavior has changed.” The attack raises the fear “that they [China]
At the conclusion of the G7 Leaders’ Summit on June 13, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who participated virtually, called for the reform of multilateral institutions as the best signal of commitment to the cause of open societies. His comments are significant in light of China’s ongoing and successful efforts to control international organizations, and, in particular, to keep Taiwan out of critical health agencies amid the COVID-19 pandemic. China’s influence over the WHO is well known. It has used this control to deny Taiwan a place at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the decisionmaking body of the WHO. Taiwan’s absence