When press officers at the White House glance up from their desks, they are constantly reminded of US President Donald Trump’s big day. On the wall, in thick dark frames, are photographs: Trump taking the oath of office, giving a thumbs up at his inaugural address, bidding farewell to former US president Barack Obama, waving to the crowd during his inaugural parade, dancing with his wife at an inaugural ball.
Walking by on Monday last week, Trump gestured towards an image of his inauguration crowd — a point that still irks him — and told reporters there would soon be an official statement about the future of his national security adviser, Michael Flynn.
Trouble was, an hour earlier, Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway had appeared on television declaring that the president had “full confidence” in Flynn.
Illustration: Mountain People
Soon after, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer read a statement that said “the president is evaluating the situation.”
Six hours later, Flynn was gone.
It was the fastest, most furious week yet for an administration that, like a runaway train, has Washington and veteran politicians shaking their heads, declaring that they have never seen such turmoil or ineptitude.
“Our government continues to be in unbelievable turmoil,” General Tony Thomas, head of the military’s special operations command, told a conference last week. “I hope they sort it out soon because we’re a nation at war.”
Some of the malaise can be attributed to the growing pains that plague any new administration. Some is said to be down to the factional struggles, imported to the White House from Trump’s businesses. And much is believed to be on the shoulders of the capricious, egocentric, volatile president, the first in US history to have been elected with no political or military experience.
However, Trump and his supporters deny the dysfunction, pointing to executive orders, a supreme court nomination and the scrapping of a Pacific trade deal at breakneck speed.
“Don’t believe the main stream (fake news) media,” Trump tweeted on Saturday morning. “The White House is running VERY WELL. I inherited a MESS and am in the process of fixing it.”
Sleeping just four or five hours a night, Trump’s manic pace has made the world’s head spin. He had an angry telephone call with the Australian prime minister, a Twitter spat that convinced the Mexican president to cancel a meeting, and consulted the Japanese prime minister about a North Korean missile launch in full view of dinner guests at his Florida country club, Mar-a-Lago.
He approved, over dinner, a commando raid in Yemen that resulted in the death of a US Navy SEAL and an eight-year-old girl.
In the US, he was caught on live television making a false claim about his electoral victory, press releases have been littered with spelling mistakes and the president has fought Twitter battles with everyone from senators to former governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger to a department store that dropped his daughter’s products.
Then there were the White House contradictions around the abrupt departure of Flynn, who misled the vice-president over his conversations with the Russian ambassador. Then Trump’s pick for US secretary of labor, Andrew Puzder, withdrew his nomination after facing questions over his personal background and business record.
Not even in his fourth week, there was the president’s ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries, an order widely denounced and sowing disarray and demonstrations at airports. Trump sacked his acting attorney general for refusing to defend the ban, attacked the courts for pausing it to weigh its lawfulness and insisted this week that it was “a very smooth roll-out.”
“This administration is running like a fine-tuned machine,” Trump said at a rambling, impromptu press conference.
That characterization has provoked scorn.
“From what I can tell, it’s non-functional,” political analyst Rick Tyler said. “It’s not firing on all cylinders, the timing is off and the ignition won’t engage.”
The executive order, “created havoc and turmoil,” Tyler said. “The communications team are incoherent, inconsistent and contradictory to what the president says.”
Democratic consultant and strategist Bob Shrum called the president’s defenses “preposterous.”
“It’s like a car where none of the gears work and you’ve no idea if you’re going at 90mph or 30mph and you’re just careening. It doesn’t remotely compare with anything I can think of. There’s never been anything like this,” he said.
One Republican with ties to the White House blamed growing pains, from Trump’s lean campaign to the staff of the federal bureaucracy.
The Trump administration has also decided to vet for any criticism of the president during the campaign. On Thursday last week, a political appointee at the US Department of Housing and Urban Development was fired after it was noticed that he had written a critical opinion column about Trump in October last year.
However, operations have also been hampered by competing interests and seething mutual suspicion. Media reports describe paranoid staff using a secret chat app that erases messages as soon as they are read.
Trump’s inner circle includes Conway; White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus; senior advisers Jared Kushner, 36, (Trump’s son-in-law) and Stephen Miller, 31; and White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon, the former Goldman Sachs executive who has likened himself to Thomas Cromwell in the court of former king of England Henry VIII.
Senator John McCain, the Republican nominee for president in 2008, told reporters this week that “whole environment is one of dysfunction in the Trump administration.”
“Who’s making the decisions in the White House? Is it the 31-year-old? Is it Mr Bannon? Is it the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff? I don’t know,” McCain said.
The default answer could still be Priebus, who, as chief of staff, would traditionally act as gatekeeper to Trump, but his boss is anything but traditional, and Priebus’s establishment influence is countered by two ideologues, Bannon and Miller.
Bannon, previously head of the right-wing Breitbart News, has been described by Democrats as a white nationalist and is seen by many as the true power behind the throne.
Last week Bannon and Priebus gave a joint media interview to deny rumors of a rift, but Tyler said: “There’s no clear chain of command. They can’t tell who’s in charge.”
“If Priebus and Bannon are doing PR [public relations] to show how well they get on, that shows Priebus is losing. He is the chief of staff, so he shouldn’t need to say he’s meeting with Bannon, who ought to be a subordinate,” Tyler said.
Meanwhile, Bannon’s allies continue to rise in prominence.
Sebastian Gorka, a deputy assistant and former editor for Breitbart, has become a vocal surrogate in a series of TV and radio interviews, telling the BBC this week that Trump’s press conference performance was “fabulous.”
Miller, too, earned Trump’s praise and widespread scorn for his zealous defense of the president and for peddling a baseless claim about phantom illegal voting.
“He says things that would make movie villains blush,” Tyler said.
The problems have been amplified by Senate Democrats doing their utmost to drag out the confirmation process on many of Trump’s Cabinet choices.
Trump is not the first president to hit early turbulence, and Bill Galston, a former adviser to former US president Bill Clinton, recalled that “hardly anyone” of the new president’s staff in 1993 had been in the White House before.
Before too long, he said, Clinton recruited political veterans Leon Panetta and David Gergen, who had worked with the former US president administrations of Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan.
“You need people there who know how overwhelming it is to be in the White House with ‘incoming’ coming at you from all directions,” Galston said.
However, Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution think tank, said that the Trump administration is not normal.
“I’ve consulted many people in town about analogies and comparisons and nobody can come up with any,” he said. “We appear to have a president who cannot distinguish chaos from order.”
In contrast, Trump’s allies contend that, for a non-politician learning on the job, he is doing well and playing the media like a fiddle.
“It’s like the beginning of any administration,” said Christopher Nixon Cox, who is well acquainted with Bannon and other members of Trump’s inner circle.
He compared Trump’s first month with Clinton’s, observing that critics also called those weeks “a disaster.”
“Every administration has its palace intrigues,” Nixon Cox said. “It’s hard to say he has any more or less. Given that we have social media and he’s a social media president, it could be we’re just more aware of what used to be kept behind closed doors. There will be good days and bad days, but it’s way too early to say it’s going to go off the rails.”
Cox, a financial adviser and grandson of Richard Nixon, added: “Fundamentally he’s going to be judged on the economy and whether he keeps peace around the world. I think it’s going to be a big success. We have to give him time.”
Tom Stewart, a member of Trump’s national security advisory council during the campaign, said that the president was “cunningly” manipulating the media, so that “his strong Cabinet will have a chance to make some meaningful reforms.”
Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist said Republicans are making good progress on their conservative agenda.
“The press and a lot of observers in Washington DC like to stop and look at a car accident and they miss that the traffic is continuing to drive past at 50mph,” he said.
Nevertheless, as Trump enters his second month, there will be many praying for a steadier hand and fewer tweets ending with exclamation marks.
“This can’t just stand,” said Rich Galen, former press secretary to vice president Dan Quayle. “It was kind of fun in the beginning watching the kids run around and bump into each other. Now they’ve got the keys to the car and it’s dangerous.”
As a person raised in a family that revered the teachings of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), I believe that both sages would agree with Hong Kong students that people-based politics is the only legitimate way to govern China, including Hong Kong. More than two millennia ago, Confucius insisted that a leader’s first loyalty is to his people — they are water to the leader’s ship. Confucius said that the water could let the ship float only if it sailed in accordance with the will of the water. If the ship sailed against the will of the water, the ship would sink. Two
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo just dropped the other shoe in the White House’s multidimensional response to the hydra-headed existential challenge from communist China. Yet his sweeping address at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum on Thursday was the most powerful yet — a virtual declaration of a new cold war and a call for global delegitimization of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) rule through what amounts to regime change. Although he did not explicitly mention either a cold war or regime change — terms that send shudders through the foreign policy establishment — Pompeo made it clear that
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties