The Legislative Yuan on Friday passed amendments to articles 77 and 78 of the Highway Act (公路法), sharply increasing the penalty for illegal operation of motor vehicle transport businesses, and such businesses may be ordered to suspend or close their operations.
However, Uber director of public policy for the Asia-Pacific region Damian Kassabgi recently said that Uber does not intend to pull out of Taiwan, but would carefully assess the development prospects for its business model and adjust its strategy.
When the amended law comes into effect it is sure to have a heavy impact on Uber, which will likely find it hard to recruit new drivers and will likely lose many of its registered drivers. Some passengers are also likely to shy away from the service.
A wise move for Uber would be to demonstrate its goodwill by talking to the Ministry of Transportation and Communications about how it can meet the ministry’s three main demands: that it accept government regulation, pay tax and pay insurance.
An opinion poll found that 76.4 percent of residents of the six special municipalities agree that Uber should stay in the market to give the public more choice, and 87.4 percent were in favor of the government holding public hearings to work out ways of managing new businesses like Uber.
The ministry should use its wisdom to turn the challenges that have arisen during Uber’s four years of operation in Taiwan into an opportunity to encourage innovative companies.
“Uber-like” businesses could be defined as network platforms for providing drivers and passengers with information about supply and demand and mediating between them. The authorities could plan for this sector to cover goods as well and include both commercial and private vehicles.
The government could also consider adding network transport services to the Highway Act, strengthening the taxation system for cross-border electronic commerce and creating new standards for mobile payments. It could also ease the provisions of Article 17 of the Company Act (公司法) regarding firms whose business requires special government permission.
Such measures would attract more international innovative enterprises to Taiwan, which would in turn motivate related Taiwanese businesses to pursue innovation and change so as to provide sustainable transport services that meet market demand.
The government can pro-actively integrate the kind of diverse taxi services that Uber offers and choose areas and conditions suitable for “Uber-like” services to operate. It can apply the principles of regulation, taxation and insurance in a diverse manner. It should stipulate that such businesses must apply for selection, certification, registration and management, and they should pay tax and establish insurance systems in accordance with the law.
Since a diverse taxi plan still involves special-purpose commercial vehicles and drivers, it lacks the advantages of shared use of transport resources. For this reason, it cannot completely replace Uber, so only if the two kinds of services are allowed to complement one another can Taiwan effectively upgrade its “quasi-public transport” sector.
This year China instituted a new law on taxi businesses, and the Chinese company Didi Chuxing acquired Uber’s legal operations in China through a share swap deal.
Taiwan could take these measures as a model for a Taiwanese version of Uber. This would attain aims of innovation in public transport services and getting more people to use public transport.
Lee Ker-tsung is an associate professor in Feng Chia University’s transportation technology and management department.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS