Tsai must show results
It has been six months since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her administration took over the government. The honeymoon is over, and we all want to see some concrete achievements, but the Tsai administration can be summed up in the words “too conservative, not enough initiative.”
In principle, the Tsai government meets the expectations of Taiwanese. Politically speaking, it has stuck to its promise to maintain the “status quo.”
Externally, the government has sustained enormous pressure from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and domestically, it has had to deal with the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) support of the PRC and the CCP.
Still, the government has not broken its pledge to 23 million Taiwanese as it has persisted in rejecting the fictitious “1992 consensus.”
The US has elected a new president in Donald Trump, and no one really knows yet what his policies will be. He might not be a traditional Republican, but the party has traditionally leaned to the right and opposed China.
Most Taiwanese over the age of 40 still remember how enamored Taiwan was of the Republican Party during the Cold War and the fight against China and Russia.
There is no reason for Tsai and her government to kowtow to China.
China’s biggest fans in the whole world are in the pan-blue camp in Taiwan, and it is also the pan-blue camp that harbors the strongest hope that China will grow strong.
It is as if they would find redemption in a strong China.
The Tsai administration’s domestic reform efforts have been too weak. The government is worrying too much over the response of vested interests and is trying too hard to please them.
The experience of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) during his eight years in office is enough to let us all know that there are some people that it is just not worth waiting for.
Although they do not say so, the reason that some people are filled with a bottomless hate for Chen is not the corruption, but his promotion of Taiwanese independence.
The corruption charges against Chen were just a reason that allowed these people to vent their hatred, and that reason was readily presented by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — “Mr 8 percent Ma.”
Taiwanese are now eagerly awaiting judicial reform, an effort to promote environmental protection, the pursuit of ill-gotten party assets and leaving Taiwan’s current economic problems behind.
These are the areas where the Tsai administration must start moving forward in great leaps in a forceful effort to come up with solutions.
It is time that the things that need doing get done, and we are all hoping that the Tsai administration will show the backbone needed to get it done.
Yang Peng-sheng
Taipei
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS