TransAsia Airways’ unexpected decision to shut down early last week has a far larger impact on society than the one-day strike by China Airlines’ flight attendants in late June, affecting not just passengers on its domestic and international routes and the jobs of its more than 1,700 employees, but the interests of investors and the nation’s tourism industry as a whole.
Ever since TransAsia announced plans to suspend services and dissolve its operations to curb losses, there were expectations that the airline’s management might change its mind.
However, such expectations were soon dashed after a debt settlement meeting between TransAsia and creditor banks on Thursday night — the 22 banks agreed to take coordinated steps over the next three months to protect their debts and assets, including the sales of TransAsia’s planes.
TransAsia reported losses of NT$2.7 billion (US$84.53 million) in the first 10 months of this year, compared with NT$1.1 billion for the whole of last year. Making matters worse is the NT$11.06 billion TransAsia borrowed from local banks in syndicated or regular loans in recent years, in addition to the US$75 million in overseas convertible bond payments due tomorrow. The airline has said it is cannot make that payment because of a shortage of funds.
Under these circumstances, the company has to bow out of the industry according to free-market principles, not the other way around. As long as TransAsia still has enough capital to refund its customers and travel agencies and cover severance pay, its decision to dissolve has to be viewed in the context of a free market.
The question of whether the government should step in to rescue TransAsia has drawn a mixed response from the public, with some people saying that it should help restructure the airline because the company’s collapse could hurt local banks and the economic repercussions of the failure would be far-reaching and hard to predict, such as job losses.
However, it is clear that the combination of safety concerns, weak business strategy, market competition and government regulations discouraged banks from offering additional credit to TransAsia to avoid bad loans, and this has made it impossible for the nation’s third-largest carrier to improve its financial condition and honor its bond payments.
Letting weaker players go to the wall — although painful in the short term — would allow the survivors to grow stronger and become more efficient, which in turn would raise the nation’s airline industry’s long-term competitiveness and help improve the economy.
Moreover, if TransAsia’s sudden move to shut down is found to have involved a conspiracy to commit securities fraud and insider trading, the public needs to change a deep-rooted mindset that the government must always stand behind such troubled firms.
The government must respond to the call from the public for tougher law enforcement and higher standards of social responsibility for corporations, as TransAsia’s owners and managers have demonstrated a lack of ethics and corporate responsibility in the string of mishaps they faced in recent years.
Despite criticism by some pundits of the government’s failure to take preventive measures, the government deserves credit for taking prompt action to help mitigate the fallout from the TransAsia closure — from demanding that China Airlines take over TransAsia’s routes before Feb. 15 to launching probes into alleged market manipulation and insider trading.
Given TransAsia management’s decision not to seek restructuring, the government must stand firm on its no-interference position and keep its pledge to provide a level playing field for all players in the industry.
Anything else is just nonsense.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS