Like other emerging economies in Asia, Taiwan saw great fluctuations in its financial markets in the three days following US president-elect Donald Trump’s surprise victory on Wednesday last week. Fortunately, Trump did not make inflammatory comments in his victory speech.
However, stunned by the election result, investors are still trying to glean information about what policies Trump plans to pursue after taking office on Jan. 20 and how that would affect their portfolios.
Experience indicates that “president Trump” might not actually follow the path laid out by “candidate Trump,” because he might face challenges winning the backing of US Congress for his policies, therefore investors do not need to worry too much about aggressive measures from the US president-elect.
However, Asia is likely to experience an initial shock in terms of investment and trade over the next few months, because of confusion and uncertainty about US policies, and delays in capital expenditures, while the real blow to the region’s economies might come next year amid higher US interest rates and a more hostile trade policy under Trump’s presidency.
Indeed, Trump’s victory symbolizes the end of the free-trade era of the past 40 years. Although he did not spend a lot of time talking about the details of his trade and economic policies throughout his campaign, his baseline hostility to free trade and repeated calls for higher tariffs on goods imported to the US have stoked fears of a more protectionist trade environment, posing risks for Asian economies, and China in particular, with regard to currency manipulation, loss of US jobs and the theft of intellectual property.
Many Taiwanese manufacturers that have built production bases in China to export goods to the US face greater uncertainty and they need to give serious consideration to the extent to which they could move their manufacturing facilities to the US to ward off trade disputes. They must also prepare for more punitive measures from the US in case anti-dumping, anti-subsidy and other trade investigations become more frequent under Trump’s presidency.
Another challenge facing Taiwan is Trump’s obvious distaste for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal. Trump never shied away from attacking free trade and globalization during his campaign, even threatening to void the TPP agreement after taking office. As a result, the White House’s acknowledgment on Friday that it is stopping the attempt to seek congressional approval for the TPP during President Barack Obama’s final months in office is not only a defeat for the Obama administration, but also a great disappointment for Taiwan, which has been trying to join the US-led TPP to help improve the nation’s overall position in regional economic integration, while decreasing its economic overdependence on China.
Despite the unpromising prospects for the TPP, Taiwan needs to move on and to continue seeking a broad-based advance in the major components of its economy, as the nation has reached a point where there is no time to waste to improve its economic structure and upgrade its industrial sector, with or without the trans-Pacific deal.
The world is not going to end for Taiwan if Trump seeks a US withdrawal from the TPP, but Taiwan needs to boost its trade ties with the US through the ongoing Trade and Investment Framework Agreement talks and has to consider that regionalism could be the dominant theme in Asia in the long term.
In view of the growth in intra-regional trade in Asia over the past few years, the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should present clearer and bolder measures on its “new southbound policy.” Most importantly, concrete steps are needed, not just discussions about policy.
Lockheed Martin on Tuesday responded to concerns over delayed shipments of F-16V Block 70 jets, saying it had added extra shifts on its production lines to accelerate progress. The Ministry of National Defense on Monday said that delivery of all 66 F-16V Block 70 jets — originally expected by the end of next year — would be pushed back due to production line relocations and global supply chain disruptions. Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that Taiwan and the US are working to resolve the delays, adding that 50 of the aircraft are in production, with 10 scheduled for flight
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,